Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fabritek Core Memory"
From Computer History Wiki
(→Still here: Amazed it still exists) |
(→Still here?: Mobies.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'm somewhat amazed the one from AI still exists. I would have assumed it would have been junked when HIC did the work to enable LISPM memory to be used on AI to replace the failing core memory. (I forget what hardware was used for the second moby on AI.) [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 21:22, 5 July 2019 (CEST) | I'm somewhat amazed the one from AI still exists. I would have assumed it would have been junked when HIC did the work to enable LISPM memory to be used on AI to replace the failing core memory. (I forget what hardware was used for the second moby on AI.) [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 21:22, 5 July 2019 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I'm amazed too! I had the idea that they should scan the contents, but I suppose the bits have dissapated by now. I think the other moby was an Ampex... but the final configuration had three mobies. The fourth was dedicated to the 10-11 interface and PDP-6. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff|talk]]) 07:27, 6 July 2019 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 07:27, 6 July 2019
Still here?
I'm somewhat amazed the one from AI still exists. I would have assumed it would have been junked when HIC did the work to enable LISPM memory to be used on AI to replace the failing core memory. (I forget what hardware was used for the second moby on AI.) Jnc (talk) 21:22, 5 July 2019 (CEST)
- I'm amazed too! I had the idea that they should scan the contents, but I suppose the bits have dissapated by now. I think the other moby was an Ampex... but the final configuration had three mobies. The fourth was dedicated to the 10-11 interface and PDP-6. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 07:27, 6 July 2019 (CEST)
