Difference between revisions of "Talk:PDP-10"

From Computer History Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Category)
m (Add sig)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
::PCjs is "WARNING: PDP-10 emulation is still in development, so functionality will be limited until further notice."
 
::PCjs is "WARNING: PDP-10 emulation is still in development, so functionality will be limited until further notice."
 
::It gives this funny init warning. "PCjs Machine "testka10"
 
::It gives this funny init warning. "PCjs Machine "testka10"
 +
 +
: [[User:ForOldHack|ForOldHack]] ([[User talk:ForOldHack|talk]]) 03:38, 25 January 2021‎

Revision as of 17:13, 2 March 2021

Category

The reason I put this page in Category: DEC Systems was that it covers a number of different machines; KA, KI, etc. So it's not really a PDP-10 system, but it covers them all. But I can see the point of putting it in Category: PDP-10 Systems, and since that cat goes in 'DEC Systems', it's still findable, so it's OK there too. Jnc (talk) 15:22, 5 July 2019 (CEST)

There is a bit of a difference between the functionality of the PDP-10/X and PCjs's PDP-10, much larger than hardware vs Software.
David Conroy's, advanced beyond the PDP-10s architecture, ran faster, and could use IDE disks, and with a software modification run ITS on a disk larger than 32MB, ( and ran on a 500MB disk ), as well as a full DEC Net protical layer, which allowed him to clone disk installations over networking.
He had some problems emulating the Floating point instructions, specifically mentioning FDIV
PCjs is "WARNING: PDP-10 emulation is still in development, so functionality will be limited until further notice."
It gives this funny init warning. "PCjs Machine "testka10"
ForOldHack (talk) 03:38, 25 January 2021‎