Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Infobox Machine"
From Computer History Wiki
(New page: What's with this? busarch is broken.) |
(Why 'cycle time'?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | What's with this? busarch is broken. | + | ==Template error== |
| + | |||
| + | What's with this? busarch is broken. [[User: FireflyST|FireflyST]] ([[User talk:FireflyST|talk]]) 00:24, 16 May 2007 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Clock speed / cycle time== | ||
| + | |||
| + | So, as we discovered with [[PDP-8]]/[[PDP-8/S]], 'clock speed' can be confusing, since some machines take a basic clock and immediately divide it down, thereby giving an incorrect sense of their speed. 'cycle time', although similarly varying in ''meaning'' from machine to machine, is at least one step up the architectural ladder, and thus more likely to be a compare-able measure of the machine's speed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I have left the old 'clock speed' parameter, so we won't have to run around and change every place that uses this, but either will show the caption 'cycle time'. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 14:22, 22 August 2019 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 14:22, 22 August 2019
Template error
What's with this? busarch is broken. FireflyST (talk) 00:24, 16 May 2007
Clock speed / cycle time
So, as we discovered with PDP-8/PDP-8/S, 'clock speed' can be confusing, since some machines take a basic clock and immediately divide it down, thereby giving an incorrect sense of their speed. 'cycle time', although similarly varying in meaning from machine to machine, is at least one step up the architectural ladder, and thus more likely to be a compare-able measure of the machine's speed.
I have left the old 'clock speed' parameter, so we won't have to run around and change every place that uses this, but either will show the caption 'cycle time'. Jnc (talk) 14:22, 22 August 2019 (CEST)
