BSD/386 - Revision history

Jnc: /* See also */ +1

2022-05-02T13:55:27Z

Jnc: +See also - 386BSD

2020-01-19T16:11:44Z

+See also - 386BSD

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 19 January 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	BSD/386 was a commercialized version of [[4.3 BSD]], and later [[4.4 BSD]] for the [[i386]] & [[sparc]] processors. A few notable people from the [[CSRG]] helped with the project.		[[Image:bsd386 1.0 ad.jpg\|thumb\|right\|300px\|A 386/BSD ad]]

			'''BSD/386''' was a commercialized version of [[4.3 BSD]], and later [[4.4 BSD]] for the [[i386]] & [[sparc]] processors. A few notable people from the [[CSRG]] helped with the project.

	At the time it was one of the cheapest UNIX'en at $500 for a binary license, and $1000 for a source license, but it failed to get big traction, probably because of the rise of [[Linux]] and the free BSD's [[NetBSD]] and [[FreeBSD]].		At the time it was one of the cheapest UNIX'en at $500 for a [[binary]] license, and $1000 for a source license, but it failed to get big traction, probably because of the rise of [[Linux]] and the free BSD's [[NetBSD]] and [[FreeBSD]].

	I know at some point in the early 1990's this was seen as '''THE''' platform for running the [[Apache]] [[Web server]], and I've even seen CD's at work that we used to run, but even early upstarts eventually switched out to FreeBSD, as it was cheaper, and the fixes came in quicker.		I know at some point in the early 1990's this was seen as '''THE''' platform for running the [[Apache]] [[Web server]], and I've even seen CD's at work that we used to run, but even early upstarts eventually switched out to FreeBSD, as it was cheaper, and the fixes came in quicker.

	[[~~Image:bsd386 1.0 ad.jpg\|thumb\|right\|300px\|A 386/BSD ad~~]]		==See also==

			* [[386BSD]]

	{{stub}}		{{semi-stub}}

	[[Category: Unix-based OS's]]		[[Category: Unix-based OS's]]

Jnc: sub-cat

2018-06-17T15:59:47Z

sub-cat

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, 17 June 2018
Line 3:		Line 3:
	At the time it was one of the cheapest UNIX'en at $500 for a binary license, and $1000 for a source license, but it failed to get big traction, probably because of the rise of [[Linux]] and the free BSD's [[NetBSD]] and [[FreeBSD]].		At the time it was one of the cheapest UNIX'en at $500 for a binary license, and $1000 for a source license, but it failed to get big traction, probably because of the rise of [[Linux]] and the free BSD's [[NetBSD]] and [[FreeBSD]].

	I know at some point in the early 1990's this was seen as THE platform for running the [[Apache]] ~~web~~ server, and I've even seen CD's at work that we used to run, but even early upstarts eventually switched out to FreeBSD, as it was cheaper, and the fixes came in quicker.		I know at some point in the early 1990's this was seen as '''THE''' platform for running the [[Apache]] [[Web server]], and I've even seen CD's at work that we used to run, but even early upstarts eventually switched out to FreeBSD, as it was cheaper, and the fixes came in quicker.

	[[Image:bsd386 1.0 ad.jpg\|thumb\|right\|300px\|A 386/BSD ad]]		[[Image:bsd386 1.0 ad.jpg\|thumb\|right\|300px\|A 386/BSD ad]]

	{{stub}}		{{stub}}
	[[Category:~~Operating Systems~~]]
			[[Category: Unix-based OS's]]

Neozeed: Undo revision 8115 by Ejolywatal (Talk)

2010-11-15T04:13:10Z

Undo revision 8115 by Ejolywatal (Talk)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
->BSD/386 was a commercialized version of [[4.3 BSD]], and later [[4.4 BSD]] for the [[i386]] &amp; [[sparc]] processors.  A few notable people from the [[CSRG]] helped with the project.
+BSD/386 was a commercialized version of [[4.3 BSD]], and later [[4.4 BSD]] for the [[i386]] & [[sparc]] processors.  A few notable people from the [[CSRG]] helped with the project.
 At the time it was one of the cheapest UNIX'en at $500 for a binary license, and $1000 for a source license, but it failed to get big traction, probably because of the rise of [[Linux]] and the free BSD's [[NetBSD]] and [[FreeBSD]].
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 {{stub}}
 [[Category:Operating Systems]]

Ejolywatal at 04:12, 15 November 2010

2010-11-15T04:12:09Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-BSD/386 was a commercialized version of [[4.3 BSD]], and later [[4.4 BSD]] for the [[i386]] & [[sparc]] processors.  A few notable people from the [[CSRG]] helped with the project.
+>BSD/386 was a commercialized version of [[4.3 BSD]], and later [[4.4 BSD]] for the [[i386]] &amp; [[sparc]] processors.  A few notable people from the [[CSRG]] helped with the project.
 At the time it was one of the cheapest UNIX'en at $500 for a binary license, and $1000 for a source license, but it failed to get big traction, probably because of the rise of [[Linux]] and the free BSD's [[NetBSD]] and [[FreeBSD]].
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 {{stub}}
 [[Category:Operating Systems]]

Neozeed at 16:43, 28 April 2010

2010-04-28T16:43:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, 28 April 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I know at some point in the early 1990's this was seen as THE platform for running the [[Apache]] web server, and I've even seen CD's at work that we used to run, but even early upstarts eventually switched out to FreeBSD, as it was cheaper, and the fixes came in quicker.		I know at some point in the early 1990's this was seen as THE platform for running the [[Apache]] web server, and I've even seen CD's at work that we used to run, but even early upstarts eventually switched out to FreeBSD, as it was cheaper, and the fixes came in quicker.

			[[Image:bsd386 1.0 ad.jpg\|thumb\|right\|300px\|A 386/BSD ad]]

	{{stub}}		{{stub}}
	[[Category:Operating Systems]]		[[Category:Operating Systems]]

Neozeed: lame initial version

2010-04-17T14:23:03Z

lame initial version

New page

BSD/386 was a commercialized version of [[4.3 BSD]], and later [[4.4 BSD]] for the [[i386]] & [[sparc]] processors. A few notable people from the [[CSRG]] helped with the project.

At the time it was one of the cheapest UNIX'en at $500 for a binary license, and $1000 for a source license, but it failed to get big traction, probably because of the rise of [[Linux]] and the free BSD's [[NetBSD]] and [[FreeBSD]].

I know at some point in the early 1990's this was seen as *THE* platform for running the [[Apache]] web server, and I've even seen CD's at work that we used to run, but even early upstarts eventually switched out to FreeBSD, as it was cheaper, and the fixes came in quicker.

{{stub}}
[[Category:Operating Systems]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 2 May 2022
Line 10:		Line 10:

	* [[386BSD]]		* [[386BSD]]
			* [[BSD/OS]]

	{{semi-stub}}		{{semi-stub}}

	[[Category: Unix-based OS's]]		[[Category: Unix-based OS's]]