Category talk:Chaos - Revision history

Jnc: Chaos protocol hardware aren't really fundamentally connected

2024-08-02T23:21:32Z

Chaos protocol hardware aren't really fundamentally connected

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:21, 2 August 2024
Line 7:		Line 7:
	: I didn't think the single category was crowded enough to warrant splitting it in two, but sure, I suppose it can't hurt.		: I didn't think the single category was crowded enough to warrant splitting it in two, but sure, I suppose it can't hurt.

	:: The issue is not the size, it's just that I'm trying to encourage a clear distinction been the Chaos protocol, and Chaosnet hardware (the hardware went out of popularity pretty quickly, but the protocol hung on for quite a while, without the hardware).		:: The issue is not the size, it's just that I'm trying to encourage a clear distinction been the Chaos protocol, and Chaosnet hardware, which aren't really fundamentally connected (the hardware went out of popularity pretty quickly, but the protocol hung on for quite a while, without the hardware).

	: Any chance it can be 'Chaosnet Protocol'? [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 1 August 2024		: Any chance it can be 'Chaosnet Protocol'? [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 1 August 2024

	:: I will have to do some research on that. I had started nudging in the direction of the split, here, by using ' ''Chaos'' protocol' and ' ''Chaosnet'' hardware', so that we could use the short forms ('Chaos' and 'Chaosnet') without any ambiguity. Let me look though all the contemporary documentation and see if 'Chaosnet' was ever used of the protocol. Until I have managed to figure that out, I will leave all the protocol-related articles where they are, and only move Chaosnet hardware-related things to a new [[:Category:Chaosnet Hardware]]. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 23:26, 1 August 2024 (CEST)		:: I will have to do some research on that. I had started nudging in the direction of the split, here, by using ' ''Chaos'' protocol' and ' ''Chaosnet'' hardware', so that we could use the short forms ('Chaos' and 'Chaosnet') without any ambiguity. Let me look though all the contemporary documentation and see if 'Chaosnet' was ever used of the protocol. Until I have managed to figure that out, I will leave all the protocol-related articles where they are, and only move Chaosnet hardware-related things to a new [[:Category:Chaosnet Hardware]]. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 23:26, 1 August 2024 (CEST)

Jnc: Fix parse error

2024-08-02T13:43:43Z

Fix parse error

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:43, 2 August 2024
Line 11:		Line 11:
	: Any chance it can be 'Chaosnet Protocol'? [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 1 August 2024		: Any chance it can be 'Chaosnet Protocol'? [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 1 August 2024

	:: I will have to do some research on that. I had started nudging in the direction of the split, here, by using '''Chaos'' protocol' and '''Chaosnet'' hardware', so that we could use the short forms ('Chaos' and 'Chaosnet') without any ambiguity. Let me look though all the contemporary documentation and see if 'Chaosnet' was ever used of the protocol. Until I have managed to figure that out, I will leave all the protocol-related articles where they are, and only move Chaosnet hardware-related things to a new [[Category:Chaosnet Hardware]]. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 23:26, 1 August 2024 (CEST)		:: I will have to do some research on that. I had started nudging in the direction of the split, here, by using ' ''Chaos'' protocol' and ' ''Chaosnet'' hardware', so that we could use the short forms ('Chaos' and 'Chaosnet') without any ambiguity. Let me look though all the contemporary documentation and see if 'Chaosnet' was ever used of the protocol. Until I have managed to figure that out, I will leave all the protocol-related articles where they are, and only move Chaosnet hardware-related things to a new [[:Category:Chaosnet Hardware]]. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 23:26, 1 August 2024 (CEST)

Jnc: /* Protocol versus hardware */ I will have to look though all the contemporary documentation - until then, I will leave all the Chaos protocol stuff where it is

2024-08-01T21:26:53Z

Protocol versus hardware: I will have to look though all the contemporary documentation - until then, I will leave all the Chaos protocol stuff where it is

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:26, 1 August 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Protocol versus hardware==		==Protocol versus hardware==

	The header for this category says it's for 'Chaos protocol' stuff, not ~~Chaos~~ hardware; but [[Chaosnet interface]] just got put here? I am thinking of re-naming this one to 'Chaos Protocol'; and also maybe setting up a new '~~Chaos~~ Hardware' category?		The header for this category says it's for 'Chaos protocol' stuff, not Chaosnet hardware; but [[Chaosnet interface]] just got put here? I am thinking of re-naming this one to 'Chaos Protocol'; and also maybe setting up a new 'Chaosnet Hardware' category?

	I had previously [[Talk:Chaosnet#Chaos hardware and protocol\|explored]] the possibility of splitting the [[Chaosnet]] article into separate 'Chaos protocol' and 'Chaos hardware' articles, but I had decided not to, because some of the content, like the early history, would not easily split (so either it would have to be duplicated, or moved into a ''third'' article). Maybe we should just bite the bullet and split it? [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 16:10, 30 July 2024 (CEST)		I had previously [[Talk:Chaosnet#Chaos hardware and protocol\|explored]] the possibility of splitting the [[Chaosnet]] article into separate 'Chaos protocol' and 'Chaos hardware' articles, but I had decided not to, because some of the content, like the early history, would not easily split (so either it would have to be duplicated, or moved into a ''third'' article). Maybe we should just bite the bullet and split it? [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 16:10, 30 July 2024 (CEST)

			: I didn't think the single category was crowded enough to warrant splitting it in two, but sure, I suppose it can't hurt.

			:: The issue is not the size, it's just that I'm trying to encourage a clear distinction been the Chaos protocol, and Chaosnet hardware (the hardware went out of popularity pretty quickly, but the protocol hung on for quite a while, without the hardware).

			: Any chance it can be 'Chaosnet Protocol'? [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 1 August 2024

			:: I will have to do some research on that. I had started nudging in the direction of the split, here, by using '''Chaos'' protocol' and '''Chaosnet'' hardware', so that we could use the short forms ('Chaos' and 'Chaosnet') without any ambiguity. Let me look though all the contemporary documentation and see if 'Chaosnet' was ever used of the protocol. Until I have managed to figure that out, I will leave all the protocol-related articles where they are, and only move Chaosnet hardware-related things to a new [[Category:Chaosnet Hardware]]. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 23:26, 1 August 2024 (CEST)

Jnc: /* Protocol versus hardware */ fix link

2024-07-30T16:04:32Z

Protocol versus hardware: fix link

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 30 July 2024
Line 3:		Line 3:
	The header for this category says it's for 'Chaos protocol' stuff, not Chaos hardware; but [[Chaosnet interface]] just got put here? I am thinking of re-naming this one to 'Chaos Protocol'; and also maybe setting up a new 'Chaos Hardware' category?		The header for this category says it's for 'Chaos protocol' stuff, not Chaos hardware; but [[Chaosnet interface]] just got put here? I am thinking of re-naming this one to 'Chaos Protocol'; and also maybe setting up a new 'Chaos Hardware' category?

	I had previously [[Chaosnet#Chaos hardware and protocol\|explored]] the possibility of splitting the [[Chaosnet]] article into separate 'Chaos protocol' and 'Chaos hardware' articles, but I had decided not to, because some of the content, like the early history, would not easily split (so either it would have to be duplicated, or moved into a ''third'' article). Maybe we should just bite the bullet and split it? [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 16:10, 30 July 2024 (CEST)		I had previously [[Talk:Chaosnet#Chaos hardware and protocol\|explored]] the possibility of splitting the [[Chaosnet]] article into separate 'Chaos protocol' and 'Chaos hardware' articles, but I had decided not to, because some of the content, like the early history, would not easily split (so either it would have to be duplicated, or moved into a ''third'' article). Maybe we should just bite the bullet and split it? [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 16:10, 30 July 2024 (CEST)

Jnc: Protocol versus hardware?

2024-07-30T14:11:27Z

Protocol versus hardware?

New page

==Protocol versus hardware==

The header for this category says it's for 'Chaos protocol' stuff, not Chaos hardware; but [[Chaosnet interface]] just got put here? I am thinking of re-naming this one to 'Chaos Protocol'; and also maybe setting up a new 'Chaos Hardware' category?

I had previously [[Chaosnet#Chaos hardware and protocol|explored]] the possibility of splitting the [[Chaosnet]] article into separate 'Chaos protocol' and 'Chaos hardware' articles, but I had decided not to, because some of the content, like the early history, would not easily split (so either it would have to be duplicated, or moved into a ''third'' article). Maybe we should just bite the bullet and split it? [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 16:10, 30 July 2024 (CEST)