John Mauchly - Revision history

Jnc: /* Further reading */ +Another AHC article

2025-02-27T14:01:43Z

‎Further reading: +Another AHC article

Jnc: Link 'Atanasoff'

2025-02-27T11:53:23Z

Link 'Atanasoff'

Jnc: /* External links */ +FBI Dossier of John William Mauchly

2025-02-25T17:32:25Z

‎External links: +FBI Dossier of John William Mauchly

Jnc: /* Further reading */ link AHC

2024-12-06T00:55:14Z

‎Further reading: link AHC

Jnc: Sort by last name, in cat

2024-08-31T18:33:52Z

Sort by last name, in cat

Jnc: Move 'controversy' material to separate article

2024-08-11T14:16:56Z

Move 'controversy' material to separate article

Jnc: fmt

2024-08-09T12:08:03Z

fmt

Jnc: /* Controversy over the ENIAC's derivation */ Mauchly himself may not fully know the influence that Atanasoff's work had

2024-08-09T11:36:53Z

‎Controversy over the ENIAC's derivation: Mauchly himself may not fully know the influence that Atanasoff's work had

Jnc: Fairly complete on the Mauchly-Atanasoff imbroglio

2024-08-08T22:07:05Z

Fairly complete on the Mauchly-Atanasoff imbroglio

New page

'''John Mauchly''' was an American [[computer scientist]] (although the term did not yet exist when he did his most consequential work). His major accomplishments were:

* Creating and running the [[ENIAC]] project, the first general-purpose [[electronic]] [[computing device]].
* Thereby convincing people generally that electronic computing devices were feasible, desirable, and useful. (The prior classified [[Colossus]] device in the UK had convinced insiders there of that, but knowledge of it was limited, although it generated numerous descendants, starting with the [[Manchester Baby]] and [[Manchester Mark I]].)
* With a team including [[J. Presper Eckert]] and [[John von Neumann]], he co-designed the [[EDVAC]], whose design document was the inspiration for most of the first generation of computers; almost all computers now are its descendants.
* With his co-worker, J. Presper Eckert, he founded the [[Eckert-Mauchly Computer Corporation]], from which several important manufacturers descended (among them [[Remington Rand]], which acquired EMCC; Remington Rand also acquired [[Engineering Research Associates|ERA]], and the group produced even more important descendants, including [[Control Data Corporation|CDC]]).
* That organization produced the [[UNIVAC I]], the first commercially available computer in the US.

==Controversy over the ENIAC's derivation==

John Mauchly's role in the ENIAC produced two related controversies, which diligent research has only partially cleared up.

In the first, after he became the professor of physics at Ursinus College in 1933, he became interested in mathematical modelling of meteorological events, and soon discovered just how much calculation was involved in such modeling. He then began to consider machines to perform such computations, and began to experiment with simple electronic devices, thinking that that technological approach might allow high-speed computation.

He then met [[John Atanasoff]] at a scientific meeting in December 1940, and learned of his work on the [[Atanasoff-Berry Computer]] (which seemed from a brief description to be just the kind of high-speed computing device that he needed); he then went to see it in person, in June, 1941, and spent several days studying the ABC in detail, and discussing it, and its possible future evolution, with Atanasoff.

This was about a year before he started on the ENIAC, in about August, 1942 - and it raises the question 'did what he learned about the ABC, and its design, have a significant influence on the eventual design of the ENIAC'? It is not easy, at this temporal distance to answer that - but there ''are'' certain indisputable factual observations we can make:

* The ABC, although more limited in capability than the kind of machine that Mauchly had apparently been thinking of, did demonstrate that high-speed electronic computing devices were feasible, and that [[digital]] devices were a viable approach; and this was all well-explained to Mauchly on his visit.
* The [[architecture]] of the ENIAC was very different from the ABC; not just in its capabilities (and thus its high-level design), but also in its lower-level details (e.g. the ABC was a [[parallel]] [[binary]] machine; ENIAC was a [[serial]] [[decimal]] machine).

So, it is clear that the ENIAC involved a great deal of pioneering thinking, and in a very different direction from the ABC. But how much did Mauchly learn from studying the ABC, and from his discussions with Atanasoff (including during communication via post, after his visit); and how much of what he learned was used in the ENIAC; and, perhaps most important, how much of an inspiration to Mauchly's own thinking was Atanasoff's work? We may never know, for sure; all we can really do is study the ABC, and the ENIAC, and wonder.

The second of the two related controversies was that unfortunately, when the time came, much later, to patent the ENIAC's contributions, the patent attempted to also claim many of the ABC's broader innovations - including its use of digital electronics to do computing. (In fairness, it should be mentioned that there are claims that it was the lawyers who drew up the patent who so broadened the claims, not Mauchly and Eckert.) This fact still later led to the overturning of the over-broad ENIAC patent, in a celebrated trial in 1973. Had the patent only claimed Mauchly and Eckert's many valuable, real, contributions, it would have been fine.

Unfortunately, the whole controversy led to a great deal of division and ill-will; much of the computer world was divided into two vehemently-opposed camps, the 'Atanasoff' camp, and the 'Mauchly/Eckert' camp, which fairly bitterly disputed to whom should go the credit for 'inventing the computer'. This was most unfortunate, as the machines of Atanasoff ''and'' Mauchly and Eckert ''both'' were major steps along the path from [[Charles Babbage|Babbage]] to modern computers; the struggle over credit has led to both sides not getting the recognition they both really ''do'' deserve.

==Further reading==

* Herman H. Goldstine, ''The Computer from Pascal to von Neumann'', Princeton University, Princeton, 1972 - describes briefly his pre-ENIAC conversations with Mauchly
* Nancy Stern, ''From ENIAC To UNIVAC: An Appraisal of the Eckert-Mauchly Computers'', Digital Press, Bedford, 1981
* Nancy Stern, "John William Mauchly: 1907-1980", Annals of the History of Computing, Volume 2, Number 2, 1980, pp. 100-103
* Kathleen Mauchly, "John Mauchly's Early Years", Annals of the History of Computing, Volume 6, Number 2, 1984, pp. 116-138 - contains detail on his work before his visit to Atanasoff
* Alice Rowe Burks, Arthur W. Burks, ''The First Electronic Computer: The Atanasoff Story'', University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1988 - Appendix B contains a lengthy and careful analysis of Kathleen Mauchly's article (above)
* Alice Rowe Burks, ''Who Invented the Computer? The Legal Battle That Changed History'', Prometheus, Amherst, 2003 - a somewhat tendentious work, which attempts to claim the crown for Atanasoff
* Alice R. Burks, Arthur W. Burks, [http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.act2080.0036.201 Who Invented the Computer? A Memoir of the 1940s], ''Michigan Quarterly Review'', Volume XXXVI, Issue 2, Spring 1997
* Allan R. Mackintosh, "The First Electronic Computer", ''Physics Today'', Volume 40, Issue 3, March 1987 - a fairly well-known early cannon-ball in the dispute
* Allan R. Mackintosh, [https://public.callutheran.edu/~reinhart/CSC521/Week3/Atanasoff.pdf Dr. Atanasoff's Computer], ''Scientific American'', Volume 259, Number 2, August 1988, pp. 90-96 - likely a variant on the above
* Saul Rosen, [https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?params=/context/cstech/article/1014/&path_info=ocr.TR_2090_1013.pdf Origins of Modern Computing] - equally tendentious, from the other direction
* Lee Loevinger, [https://repository.law.uic.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1273&context=jitpl The Invention and Future of the Computer], ''John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law'', Volume 15, Issue 1, Fall 1996 - a somewhat less-loaded summary, by a non-technologist outsider

==External links==

* [https://www.aip.org/history-programs/niels-bohr-library/oral-histories/31773 John Mauchly] - oral history interview at the American Institute of Physics
* [https://history.computer.org/pioneers/mauchly.html John William Mauchly] - biography at the [[IEEE]] Computer Society History Committee; contains an excellent bibliography
* [https://www.nae.edu/19579/19581/51314/51353/215767/JOHN-WILLIAM-MAUCHLY-19071980 John William Mauchly 1907-1980] - biography at the National Academy of Engineering
* [https://lemelson.mit.edu/resources/j-presper-eckert-and-john-mauchly J. Presper Eckert and John Mauchly] - biography at the Lemelson Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology

[[Category: People]]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 * Nancy Stern, "John William Mauchly: 1907-1980", [[Annals of the History of Computing]], Vol. 2, No. 2, 1980, pp. 100-103
 * Kathleen Mauchly, "John Mauchly's Early Years", Annals of the History of Computing, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1984, pp. 116-138 - contains detail on his work before his visit to Atanasoff
 * Alice Rowe Burks, Arthur W. Burks, ''The First Electronic Computer: The Atanasoff Story'', University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1988 - Appendix B contains a lengthy and careful analysis of Kathleen Mauchly's article (above)

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 * That organization produced the [[UNIVAC I]], the first commercially available computer in the US.
-John Mauchly's role in the ENIAC produced [[Atanasoff-Mauchly controversy|two related controversies]], which diligent research has only partially cleared up. Unfortunately, the whole controversy led to a great deal of division and ill-will; much of the computer world was divided into two vehemently-opposed camps, the 'Atanasoff' camp, and the 'Mauchly/Eckert' camp, which fairly bitterly disputed to whom should go the credit for 'inventing the computer'. This was most unfortunate, as the machines of Atanasoff ''and'' Mauchly and Eckert ''both'' were major steps along the path from [[Charles Babbage|Babbage]] to modern computers; the struggle over credit has led to both sides not getting the recognition they both really ''do'' deserve.
+John Mauchly's role in the ENIAC produced [[Atanasoff-Mauchly controversy|two related controversies]], which diligent research has only partially cleared up. Unfortunately, the whole controversy led to a great deal of division and ill-will; much of the computer world was divided into two vehemently-opposed camps, the '[[John Vincent Atanasoff|Atanasoff]]' camp, and the 'Mauchly/Eckert' camp, which fairly bitterly disputed to whom should go the credit for 'inventing the computer'. This was most unfortunate, as the machines of Atanasoff ''and'' Mauchly and Eckert ''both'' were major steps along the path from [[Charles Babbage|Babbage]] to modern computers; the struggle over credit has led to both sides not getting the recognition they both really ''do'' deserve.
 ==Further reading==

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:33, 31 August 2024
Line 25:		Line 25:
	* [https://lemelson.mit.edu/resources/j-presper-eckert-and-john-mauchly J. Presper Eckert and John Mauchly] - biography at the Lemelson Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology		* [https://lemelson.mit.edu/resources/j-presper-eckert-and-john-mauchly J. Presper Eckert and John Mauchly] - biography at the Lemelson Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology

		+	{{DEFAULTSORT: Mauchly, John}}
	[[Category: People]]		[[Category: People]]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 * [https://www.nae.edu/19579/19581/51314/51353/215767/JOHN-WILLIAM-MAUCHLY-19071980 John William Mauchly 1907-1980] - biography at the National Academy of Engineering
 * [https://lemelson.mit.edu/resources/j-presper-eckert-and-john-mauchly J. Presper Eckert and John Mauchly] - biography at the Lemelson Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
 {{DEFAULTSORT: Mauchly, John}}
 [[Category: People]]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 * Nancy Stern, ''From ENIAC To UNIVAC: An Appraisal of the Eckert-Mauchly Computers'', Digital Press, Bedford, 1981
 * Arthur Lawrence Norberg; ''Computers and Commerce: A Study of Technology and Management at Eckert-Mauchly Computer Company, Engineering Research Associates, and Remington Rand''; MIT Press, Cambridge, 2005
-* Nancy Stern, "John William Mauchly: 1907-1980", Annals of the History of Computing, Volume 2, Number 2, 1980, pp. 100-103
+* Nancy Stern, "John William Mauchly: 1907-1980", [[Annals of the History of Computing]], Vol. 2, No. 2, 1980, pp. 100-103
-* Kathleen Mauchly, "John Mauchly's Early Years", Annals of the History of Computing, Volume 6, Number 2, 1984, pp. 116-138 - contains detail on his work before his visit to Atanasoff
+* Kathleen Mauchly, "John Mauchly's Early Years", Annals of the History of Computing, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1984, pp. 116-138 - contains detail on his work before his visit to Atanasoff
 * Alice Rowe Burks, Arthur W. Burks, ''The First Electronic Computer: The Atanasoff Story'', University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1988 - Appendix B contains a lengthy and careful analysis of Kathleen Mauchly's article (above)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 * Creating and running the [[ENIAC]] project, the first general-purpose [[electronic]] [[computing device]].
-* Thereby convincing people generally that electronic computing devices were feasible, desirable, and useful. (The prior classified [[Colossus]] device in the UK had convinced insiders there of that, but knowledge of it was limited, although it generated numerous descendants, starting with the [[Manchester  Baby]] and [[Manchester Mark I]].)
+* Thereby convincing people generally that electronic computing devices were feasible, desirable, and useful. (The prior classified [[Colossus]] device in the UK had convinced insiders there of that, but knowledge of it was limited, although it generated numerous descendants, starting with the [[Manchester Baby]] and [[Manchester Mark I]].)
 * With a team including [[J. Presper Eckert]] and [[John von Neumann]], he co-designed the [[EDVAC]], whose design document was the inspiration for most of the first generation of computers; almost all computers now are its descendants.
 * With his co-worker, J. Presper Eckert, he founded the [[Eckert-Mauchly Computer Corporation]], from which several important manufacturers descended (among them [[Remington Rand]], which acquired EMCC; Remington Rand also acquired [[Engineering Research Associates|ERA]], and the group produced even more important descendants, including [[Control Data Corporation|CDC]]).

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 This was about a year before he started on the ENIAC, in about August, 1942 - and it raises the question 'did what he learned about the ABC, and its design, have a significant influence on the eventual design of the ENIAC'? It is not easy, at this temporal distance to answer that - but there ''are'' certain indisputable factual observations we can make:
-* The ABC, although more limited in capability than the kind of machine that Mauchly had apparently been thinking of, did demonstrate that high-speed electronic computing devices were feasible, and that [[digital]] devices were a viable approach; and this was all well-explained to Mauchly on his visit.
+* The ABC, although more limited in capability than the kind of machine that Mauchly had apparently been thinking of, did demonstrate that high-speed electronic computing devices were feasible, and that [[digital]] devices were a viable approach; and this was all well-explained to Mauchly on his visit. (The purely electronic portion of the ABC eventually worked fine; its main remaining problem was elsewhere.)
 * The [[architecture]] of the ENIAC was very different from the ABC; not just in its capabilities (and thus its high-level design), but also in its lower-level details (e.g. the ABC was a [[parallel]] [[binary]] machine; ENIAC was a [[serial]] [[decimal]] machine).
-So, it is clear that the ENIAC involved a great deal of pioneering thinking, and in a very different direction from the ABC. But how much did Mauchly learn from studying the ABC, and from his discussions with Atanasoff (including during communication via post, after his visit); and how much of what he learned was used in the ENIAC; and, perhaps most important, how much of an inspiration to Mauchly's own thinking was Atanasoff's work? We may never know, for sure; all we can really do is study the ABC, and the ENIAC, and wonder.
+So, it is clear that the ENIAC involved a great deal of pioneering thinking, and in a very different direction from the ABC. But how much did Mauchly learn from studying the ABC, and from his discussions with Atanasoff (including during communication via post, after his visit); and how much of what he learned was used in the ENIAC; and, perhaps most important, how much of an inspiration to Mauchly's own thinking was Atanasoff's work?
 The second of the two related controversies was that unfortunately, when the time came, much later, to patent the ENIAC's contributions, the patent attempted to also claim many of the ABC's broader innovations - including its use of digital electronics to do computing. (In fairness, it should be mentioned that there are claims that it was the lawyers who drew up the patent who so broadened the claims, not Mauchly and Eckert.) This fact still later led to the overturning of the over-broad ENIAC patent, in a celebrated trial in 1973. Had the patent only claimed Mauchly and Eckert's many valuable, real, contributions, it would have been fine.