Talk:386BSD - Revision history

Jnc: Jnc moved page Talk:386 BSD to Talk:386BSD: Correct name has no space

2018-12-18T14:41:57Z

Jnc moved page Talk:386 BSD to Talk:386BSD: Correct name has no space

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:41, 18 December 2018
(No difference)

2014-01-06T10:05:01Z

64 bit Jolix: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:05, 6 January 2014
Line 283:		Line 283:

	"Ebenfalls von Dr. Dobb's Journal wurde schließlich 1995 noch ein Update auf die letzte öffentliche Version 386BSD 2.0 in Form einer Update-Diskette herausgegeben."		"Ebenfalls von Dr. Dobb's Journal wurde schließlich 1995 noch ein Update auf die letzte öffentliche Version 386BSD 2.0 in Form einer Update-Diskette herausgegeben."

			== 64 bit Jolix ==

			Just musings I suppose..
			http://blog.jolix.com/categorylist_html?cat_id=6

2013-04-03T10:43:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:43, 3 April 2013
Line 275:		Line 275:
	:Re: ''"The 386BSD bootflop does something odd. The workaround is to patch bochs to ignore it instead of panic when 386BSD tries to write 0x02 to port 20h."''		:Re: ''"The 386BSD bootflop does something odd. The workaround is to patch bochs to ignore it instead of panic when 386BSD tries to write 0x02 to port 20h."''
	:I had a look at bochs-2.4.6, and it appears to have the 386BSD workaround patch included now. --[[User:Tor\|Tor]] ([[User talk:Tor\|talk]]) 01:40, 2 April 2013 (PDT)		:I had a look at bochs-2.4.6, and it appears to have the 386BSD workaround patch included now. --[[User:Tor\|Tor]] ([[User talk:Tor\|talk]]) 01:40, 2 April 2013 (PDT)

			::Thx, updated the install manual. [[User:Dugo\|Dugo]] ([[User talk:Dugo\|talk]]) 03:43, 3 April 2013 (PDT)

	== 2.0 ==		== 2.0 ==

2013-04-02T08:40:47Z

Update on Bochs patch

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:40, 2 April 2013
Line 272:		Line 272:
	Getting there. While I think it is important to have this piece of history (386BSD 0.1 + patchkits) preserved for future emulator use there is something missing. Anyone with a clue where I can get an ISO of the 386BSD 1.0 release William & Lynne Jolitz show off on their website http://www.386bsd.org/past ?		Getting there. While I think it is important to have this piece of history (386BSD 0.1 + patchkits) preserved for future emulator use there is something missing. Anyone with a clue where I can get an ISO of the 386BSD 1.0 release William & Lynne Jolitz show off on their website http://www.386bsd.org/past ?
	[[User:Dugo\|Dugo]] 05:26, 13 April 2010 (UTC)		[[User:Dugo\|Dugo]] 05:26, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

			:Re: ''"The 386BSD bootflop does something odd. The workaround is to patch bochs to ignore it instead of panic when 386BSD tries to write 0x02 to port 20h."''
			:I had a look at bochs-2.4.6, and it appears to have the 386BSD workaround patch included now. --[[User:Tor\|Tor]] ([[User talk:Tor\|talk]]) 01:40, 2 April 2013 (PDT)

	== 2.0 ==		== 2.0 ==

2010-12-02T22:59:20Z

2.0: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 2 December 2010
Line 272:		Line 272:
	Getting there. While I think it is important to have this piece of history (386BSD 0.1 + patchkits) preserved for future emulator use there is something missing. Anyone with a clue where I can get an ISO of the 386BSD 1.0 release William & Lynne Jolitz show off on their website http://www.386bsd.org/past ?		Getting there. While I think it is important to have this piece of history (386BSD 0.1 + patchkits) preserved for future emulator use there is something missing. Anyone with a clue where I can get an ISO of the 386BSD 1.0 release William & Lynne Jolitz show off on their website http://www.386bsd.org/past ?
	[[User:Dugo\|Dugo]] 05:26, 13 April 2010 (UTC)		[[User:Dugo\|Dugo]] 05:26, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

			== 2.0 ==

			I browsed through a load of old DDJ in the late 90s but can't remember a full blown 2.0 CDROM release. A Net release would have left traces on <strike>Dejanews</strike> google news. The German wiki on 386BSD mentions something about an update disk.

			"Ebenfalls von Dr. Dobb's Journal wurde schließlich 1995 noch ein Update auf die letzte öffentliche Version 386BSD 2.0 in Form einer Update-Diskette herausgegeben."

2010-07-05T13:23:47Z

Updated my comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:23, 5 July 2010
Line 254:		Line 254:
	[[User:Dugo\|Dugo]]		[[User:Dugo\|Dugo]]
	[[User:Dugo\|Dugo]]		[[User:Dugo\|Dugo]]
	:Very interesting. I was using the 0.1 release for a short while when it came out, the reason I switched over to Linux 0.95 (early 1992) was IIRC something about the disk usage - I seem to recall that 386BSD wanted the whole disk while it was easy enough to partition with Linux. Or something other that made it easier to let Linux co-exist. Fuzzy memory. -- [[User:Tor\|Tor]] 13:43, 30 June 2010 (UTC)		:Very interesting. I was using the 0.1 release (actually it may have been the 0.0 release, around Jan. 1992) for a short while when it came out, the reason I switched over to Linux 0.95 (early 1992) was IIRC something about the disk usage - I seem to recall that 386BSD wanted the whole disk while it was easy enough to partition with Linux. Or something other that made it easier to let Linux co-exist. Fuzzy memory. -- [[User:Tor\|Tor]] 13:43, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

	Damn dude, that's like an install article... feel free to write one (use any tutorial as a template if you want) or I'll just do it...		Damn dude, that's like an install article... feel free to write one (use any tutorial as a template if you want) or I'll just do it...

2010-06-30T13:43:15Z

Added comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:43, 30 June 2010
Line 254:		Line 254:
	[[User:Dugo\|Dugo]]		[[User:Dugo\|Dugo]]
	[[User:Dugo\|Dugo]]		[[User:Dugo\|Dugo]]
			:Very interesting. I was using the 0.1 release for a short while when it came out, the reason I switched over to Linux 0.95 (early 1992) was IIRC something about the disk usage - I seem to recall that 386BSD wanted the whole disk while it was easy enough to partition with Linux. Or something other that made it easier to let Linux co-exist. Fuzzy memory. -- [[User:Tor\|Tor]] 13:43, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

	Damn dude, that's like an install article... feel free to write one (use any tutorial as a template if you want) or I'll just do it...		Damn dude, that's like an install article... feel free to write one (use any tutorial as a template if you want) or I'll just do it...

2010-04-13T05:26:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:26, 13 April 2010
Line 269:		Line 269:
	Awesome job so far!		Awesome job so far!
	[[User:Neozeed\|neozeed]] 20:40, 9 April 2010 (UTC)		[[User:Neozeed\|neozeed]] 20:40, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

			Getting there. While I think it is important to have this piece of history (386BSD 0.1 + patchkits) preserved for future emulator use there is something missing. Anyone with a clue where I can get an ISO of the 386BSD 1.0 release William & Lynne Jolitz show off on their website http://www.386bsd.org/past ?
			[[User:Dugo\|Dugo]] 05:26, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

2010-04-09T20:40:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:40, 9 April 2010
Line 265:		Line 265:
	I'll try to iron out any misdirections in the above and fold it into a networking with bochs and a 386BSD on bochs tutorial.		I'll try to iron out any misdirections in the above and fold it into a networking with bochs and a 386BSD on bochs tutorial.
	[[User:Dugo\|Dugo]] 10:23, 5 April 2010 (UTC)		[[User:Dugo\|Dugo]] 10:23, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

			----
			Awesome job so far!
			[[User:Neozeed\|neozeed]] 20:40, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

2010-04-05T10:23:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:23, 5 April 2010
Line 262:		Line 262:

	[[User:Neozeed\|neozeed]] 04:21, 5 April 2010 (UTC)		[[User:Neozeed\|neozeed]] 04:21, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

			I'll try to iron out any misdirections in the above and fold it into a networking with bochs and a 386BSD on bochs tutorial.
			[[User:Dugo\|Dugo]] 10:23, 5 April 2010 (UTC)