Talk:Ethernet - Revision history

Jnc: /* Split coverage of Experimental Ethernet to a separate page? */ new section

2022-12-31T13:55:51Z

Split coverage of Experimental Ethernet to a separate page?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 31 December 2022
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:: OK, thanks for confirming that. I have checked all the articles that [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Ethernet\|link to 'Ethernet']], and found a few that needed correction. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 14:32, 21 August 2022 (CEST)		:: OK, thanks for confirming that. I have checked all the articles that [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Ethernet\|link to 'Ethernet']], and found a few that needed correction. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 14:32, 21 August 2022 (CEST)

			== Split coverage of Experimental Ethernet to a separate page? ==

			For historical reasons in the content creation, the Experimental Ethernet is covered here, along with the DIX Ethernet. Should we move the former to [[Experimental Ethernet]]? If so, should DIX Ethernet content be moved to [[DIX Ethernet]]? [[Ethernet]] could not become simply a disambiguation page, as there is some material which is shared between the two - e.g. they both use CSMA-CD - and that should not be duplicated (something which I generally abhor - "In anything at all, perfection has been attained not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away".)

			I dunno; looking at it, there's not much to move to [[Experimental Ethernet]]. Maybe it's good the way it is? [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 14:55, 31 December 2022 (CET)

Jnc: /* Capitalization? */ Thanks for confirming that; I have checked all the articles that link to it

2022-08-21T12:32:24Z

Capitalization?: Thanks for confirming that; I have checked all the articles that link to it

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:32, 21 August 2022
Line 10:		Line 10:

	: Yes, I think so - similar to names of companies, products, etc. And I remember that DEC capitalized "Ethernet" almost always. [[User:Vaxorcist\|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist\|talk]]) 13:38, 20 August 2022 (CEST)		: Yes, I think so - similar to names of companies, products, etc. And I remember that DEC capitalized "Ethernet" almost always. [[User:Vaxorcist\|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist\|talk]]) 13:38, 20 August 2022 (CEST)

			:: OK, thanks for confirming that. I have checked all the articles that [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Ethernet\|link to 'Ethernet']], and found a few that needed correction. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 14:32, 21 August 2022 (CEST)

Vaxorcist at 11:38, 20 August 2022

2022-08-20T11:38:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:38, 20 August 2022
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Was 'ethernet' canonically capitalized ('Ethernet') or not? I seem to recall that it was? [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 05:13, 20 August 2022 (CEST)		Was 'ethernet' canonically capitalized ('Ethernet') or not? I seem to recall that it was? [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 05:13, 20 August 2022 (CEST)

			: Yes, I think so - similar to names of companies, products, etc. And I remember that DEC capitalized "Ethernet" almost always. [[User:Vaxorcist\|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist\|talk]]) 13:38, 20 August 2022 (CEST)

Jnc: /* Capitalization? */ new section

2022-08-20T03:13:47Z

Capitalization?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, 20 August 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:

	: Oh, you might be right; that 'rings a bell', as the English expression goes. Let me dig into my archive of contemporary documents, and see what I can find. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 11:51, 11 June 2022 (CEST)		: Oh, you might be right; that 'rings a bell', as the English expression goes. Let me dig into my archive of contemporary documents, and see what I can find. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 11:51, 11 June 2022 (CEST)

			== Capitalization? ==

			Was 'ethernet' canonically capitalized ('Ethernet') or not? I seem to recall that it was? [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 05:13, 20 August 2022 (CEST)

Jnc: You might be right; let me check

2022-06-11T09:52:09Z

You might be right; let me check

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:52, 11 June 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Tri-company acronym==

	I remember the acronym for DEC, Intel and Xerox being "DIX" instead of "XDI". [[User:Vaxorcist\|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist\|talk]]) 08:13, 11 June 2022 (CEST)		I remember the acronym for DEC, Intel and Xerox being "DIX" instead of "XDI". [[User:Vaxorcist\|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist\|talk]]) 08:13, 11 June 2022 (CEST)

			: Oh, you might be right; that 'rings a bell', as the English expression goes. Let me dig into my archive of contemporary documents, and see what I can find. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 11:51, 11 June 2022 (CEST)

Vaxorcist: Created page with "I remember the acronym for DEC, Intel and Xerox being "DIX" instead of "XDI". ~~~~"

2022-06-11T06:13:31Z

Created page with "I remember the acronym for DEC, Intel and Xerox being "DIX" instead of "XDI". ~~~~"

New page

I remember the acronym for DEC, Intel and Xerox being "DIX" instead of "XDI". [[User:Vaxorcist|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist|talk]]) 08:13, 11 June 2022 (CEST)