Talk:Systems Concepts DK-10 - Revision history

Larsbrinkhoff: /* Busses */ Sounds fair.

2022-10-24T12:28:33Z

‎Busses: Sounds fair.

Jnc: /* Busses */ Suggested article text

2022-10-24T11:50:48Z

‎Busses: Suggested article text

Larsbrinkhoff: /* Busses */ Yes, and DC-10 too.

2022-10-24T05:03:40Z

‎Busses: Yes, and DC-10 too.

Jnc: /* Busses */ Must be connected to the I/O bus too?

2022-10-24T01:23:20Z

‎Busses: Must be connected to the I/O bus too?

New page

==Busses==

The current writeup mentions that it uses the [[PDP-10 Memory Bus‎‎]], but for interrupts it must also be connected to the [[PDP-10 I/O Bus‎‎]]? [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 03:23, 24 October 2022 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:28, 24 October 2022
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:: I was mostly noting that the page doesn't mention the connection to the I/O bus. Does it share that of the DC-10 for that, too? I had a quick look at the linked hardware memo, but that's mostly how to program it, not details of the physical instantiation. Without confirmation, I guess we should say something like 'It is also attached to the I/O bus, for interrupts and CONO/CONI operations; this is presumably also through the DC-10, but this has not been confirmed.' [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 13:50, 24 October 2022 (CEST)		:: I was mostly noting that the page doesn't mention the connection to the I/O bus. Does it share that of the DC-10 for that, too? I had a quick look at the linked hardware memo, but that's mostly how to program it, not details of the physical instantiation. Without confirmation, I guess we should say something like 'It is also attached to the I/O bus, for interrupts and CONO/CONI operations; this is presumably also through the DC-10, but this has not been confirmed.' [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 13:50, 24 October 2022 (CEST)
		+
		+	::: That sounds fair. Both devices used both IO and memory buses. I don't know how much the two devices shared. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 14:28, 24 October 2022 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:50, 24 October 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:

	: That's right. And the rumor is that the DK-10 and DC-10 sat in the same box, sharing a memory interface. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 07:03, 24 October 2022 (CEST)		: That's right. And the rumor is that the DK-10 and DC-10 sat in the same box, sharing a memory interface. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 07:03, 24 October 2022 (CEST)
		+
		+	:: I was mostly noting that the page doesn't mention the connection to the I/O bus. Does it share that of the DC-10 for that, too? I had a quick look at the linked hardware memo, but that's mostly how to program it, not details of the physical instantiation. Without confirmation, I guess we should say something like 'It is also attached to the I/O bus, for interrupts and CONO/CONI operations; this is presumably also through the DC-10, but this has not been confirmed.' [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 13:50, 24 October 2022 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 24 October 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The current writeup mentions that it uses the [[PDP-10 Memory Bus‎‎]], but for interrupts it must also be connected to the [[PDP-10 I/O Bus‎‎]]? [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 03:23, 24 October 2022 (CEST)		The current writeup mentions that it uses the [[PDP-10 Memory Bus‎‎]], but for interrupts it must also be connected to the [[PDP-10 I/O Bus‎‎]]? [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 03:23, 24 October 2022 (CEST)
		+
		+	: That's right. And the rumor is that the DK-10 and DC-10 sat in the same box, sharing a memory interface. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 07:03, 24 October 2022 (CEST)