Talk:TENEX - Revision history

Larsbrinkhoff: /* Hierarchical file system? */ Soon to be tested on a running system.

2022-04-22T05:04:36Z

‎Hierarchical file system?: Soon to be tested on a running system.

Jnc: /* Hierarchical file system? */ Looks like no

2022-04-21T20:02:37Z

‎Hierarchical file system?: Looks like no

Jnc: /* Hierarchical file system? */ Could be....

2022-04-21T16:51:23Z

‎Hierarchical file system?: Could be....

Larsbrinkhoff: Hierarchical file system?

2022-04-21T08:10:06Z

Hierarchical file system?

Larsbrinkhoff: /* SDS940 connection */

2018-03-29T16:23:36Z

‎SDS940 connection

Larsbrinkhoff: Remove comment about category, it looks good now.

2018-03-29T16:22:09Z

Remove comment about category, it looks good now.

Jnc: /* SDS940 connection */ BBN had a 940 with Genie on it

2018-03-29T15:28:21Z

‎SDS940 connection: BBN had a 940 with Genie on it

Jnc: /* SDS940 connection */

2018-03-29T15:17:34Z

‎SDS940 connection

Jnc: Add section header

2018-01-23T21:59:38Z

Add section header

Larsbrinkhoff: Created page with "I don't see the Operating Systems category here, but it's classified as such. ~~~"

2018-01-23T18:40:06Z

Created page with "I don't see the Operating Systems category here, but it's classified as such. ~~~"

New page

I don't see the Operating Systems category here, but it's classified as such. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff|talk]])

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:04, 22 April 2022
Line 14:		Line 14:

	: Yeah, I think you're right. [https://opost.com/tenex/tenex72.txt TENEX, A Paged Time Sharing System for the PDP-10] "1.0 INTRODUCTION" says "File system .. built on multi-level symbolic directory structure", but then "5.0 THE TENEX FILE SYSTEM" says "A symbolic name for TENEX files consists of up to five fields [below - JNC] and thus conceptually represents a tree of maximum depth five. .. This scheme was chosen rather than a full tree to simplify the problem of compatibility with existing DEC PDP-10 software .. We are currently considering the feasibility of implementing a full tree directory structure similar to MULTICS", so it sounds like not. (The 5 fields are "device name, directory name, file name, extension, and version number".) [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 22:02, 21 April 2022 (CEST)		: Yeah, I think you're right. [https://opost.com/tenex/tenex72.txt TENEX, A Paged Time Sharing System for the PDP-10] "1.0 INTRODUCTION" says "File system .. built on multi-level symbolic directory structure", but then "5.0 THE TENEX FILE SYSTEM" says "A symbolic name for TENEX files consists of up to five fields [below - JNC] and thus conceptually represents a tree of maximum depth five. .. This scheme was chosen rather than a full tree to simplify the problem of compatibility with existing DEC PDP-10 software .. We are currently considering the feasibility of implementing a full tree directory structure similar to MULTICS", so it sounds like not. (The 5 fields are "device name, directory name, file name, extension, and version number".) [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 22:02, 21 April 2022 (CEST)
		+
		+	:: Thanks! I hope to verify this empirically soon. We have the SUMEX-AIM monitor, based on TENEX 1.31, running on a PDP-10 emulator, and are working on bringing up the rest of the system. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 07:04, 22 April 2022 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:02, 21 April 2022
Line 12:		Line 12:

	: Oh, could be. I assumed there were because of my use of TOPS-20 (on MIT-XX) which had them, and since TOPS-20 was based on TENEX... Let me check it out in the TENEX docs (Dan Murphy's site has the ACM paper - I think I have a photocopy somewhere I made 4 decades ago! :-), and then I'll fix the page. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 18:51, 21 April 2022 (CEST)		: Oh, could be. I assumed there were because of my use of TOPS-20 (on MIT-XX) which had them, and since TOPS-20 was based on TENEX... Let me check it out in the TENEX docs (Dan Murphy's site has the ACM paper - I think I have a photocopy somewhere I made 4 decades ago! :-), and then I'll fix the page. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 18:51, 21 April 2022 (CEST)
		+
		+	: Yeah, I think you're right. [https://opost.com/tenex/tenex72.txt TENEX, A Paged Time Sharing System for the PDP-10] "1.0 INTRODUCTION" says "File system .. built on multi-level symbolic directory structure", but then "5.0 THE TENEX FILE SYSTEM" says "A symbolic name for TENEX files consists of up to five fields [below - JNC] and thus conceptually represents a tree of maximum depth five. .. This scheme was chosen rather than a full tree to simplify the problem of compatibility with existing DEC PDP-10 software .. We are currently considering the feasibility of implementing a full tree directory structure similar to MULTICS", so it sounds like not. (The 5 fields are "device name, directory name, file name, extension, and version number".) [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 22:02, 21 April 2022 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, 21 April 2022
Line 10:		Line 10:

	I'm not sure, but I have the impression there was no directory hierarchy. [https://opost.com/tenex/tenex72.txt Murphy's paper] says "We are currently considering the feasibility of implementing a full tree directory structure similar to MULTICS". [https://www.ultimate.com/phil/pdp10/tops-20 Budne's TOPS-20 Evolution] says it was added in TOPS-20 V3; I have verified this running V3A. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 10:09, 21 April 2022 (CEST)		I'm not sure, but I have the impression there was no directory hierarchy. [https://opost.com/tenex/tenex72.txt Murphy's paper] says "We are currently considering the feasibility of implementing a full tree directory structure similar to MULTICS". [https://www.ultimate.com/phil/pdp10/tops-20 Budne's TOPS-20 Evolution] says it was added in TOPS-20 V3; I have verified this running V3A. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 10:09, 21 April 2022 (CEST)
		+
		+	: Oh, could be. I assumed there were because of my use of TOPS-20 (on MIT-XX) which had them, and since TOPS-20 was based on TENEX... Let me check it out in the TENEX docs (Dan Murphy's site has the ACM paper - I think I have a photocopy somewhere I made 4 decades ago! :-), and then I'll fix the page. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 18:51, 21 April 2022 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:10, 21 April 2022
Line 6:		Line 6:

	: Thanks. I did check the Murphy papers, but it doesn't explicitly say that parts could be a close translation, which is what I find interesting. Hopefully, the 940 sources will be available soonish. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 18:23, 29 March 2018 (CEST)		: Thanks. I did check the Murphy papers, but it doesn't explicitly say that parts could be a close translation, which is what I find interesting. Hopefully, the 940 sources will be available soonish. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 18:23, 29 March 2018 (CEST)
		+
		+	==Hierarchical file system?==
		+
		+	I'm not sure, but I have the impression there was no directory hierarchy. [https://opost.com/tenex/tenex72.txt Murphy's paper] says "We are currently considering the feasibility of implementing a full tree directory structure similar to MULTICS". [https://www.ultimate.com/phil/pdp10/tops-20 Budne's TOPS-20 Evolution] says it was added in TOPS-20 V3; I have verified this running V3A. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 10:09, 21 April 2022 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:23, 29 March 2018
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Also, according to "TENEX and TOPS-20", by Dan Murphy (IEEE Annals 37-1, pp. 75-82), BBN actually for a number of years had a 940 with the Berkeley OS on it; so they would have had personal experience with it. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 17:28, 29 March 2018 (CEST)		Also, according to "TENEX and TOPS-20", by Dan Murphy (IEEE Annals 37-1, pp. 75-82), BBN actually for a number of years had a 940 with the Berkeley OS on it; so they would have had personal experience with it. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 17:28, 29 March 2018 (CEST)
		+
		+	: Thanks. I did check the Murphy papers, but it doesn't explicitly say that parts could be a close translation, which is what I find interesting. Hopefully, the 940 sources will be available soonish. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 18:23, 29 March 2018 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 29 March 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~==Category==~~
−
−	~~I don't see the Operating Systems category here, but it's classified as such. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]])~~
−
	==SDS940 connection==		==SDS940 connection==

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 29 March 2018
Line 6:		Line 6:

	The first/main TENEX paper ("TENEX, A Paged Time Sharing System for the PDP-10", by Bobrow, Burchfield, Murphy and Tomlinson) specifically calls out the 940 as one of the systems they used as a model. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 17:17, 29 March 2018 (CEST)		The first/main TENEX paper ("TENEX, A Paged Time Sharing System for the PDP-10", by Bobrow, Burchfield, Murphy and Tomlinson) specifically calls out the 940 as one of the systems they used as a model. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 17:17, 29 March 2018 (CEST)
		+
		+	Also, according to "TENEX and TOPS-20", by Dan Murphy (IEEE Annals 37-1, pp. 75-82), BBN actually for a number of years had a 940 with the Berkeley OS on it; so they would have had personal experience with it. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 17:28, 29 March 2018 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:17, 29 March 2018
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I don't see the Operating Systems category here, but it's classified as such. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]])		I don't see the Operating Systems category here, but it's classified as such. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]])
		+
		+	==SDS940 connection==
		+
		+	The first/main TENEX paper ("TENEX, A Paged Time Sharing System for the PDP-10", by Bobrow, Burchfield, Murphy and Tomlinson) specifically calls out the 940 as one of the systems they used as a model. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 17:17, 29 March 2018 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:59, 23 January 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==Category==
		+
	I don't see the Operating Systems category here, but it's classified as such. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]])		I don't see the Operating Systems category here, but it's classified as such. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]])