Template talk:Nav PDP-11 - Revision history

Vaxorcist: /* Buses */

2023-06-29T18:17:58Z

‎Buses

Jnc: /* Buses */ CTI BUS‎‎ is not important enough to be worth cluttering up this navigation box with

2023-06-28T14:49:40Z

‎Buses: CTI BUS‎‎ is not important enough to be worth cluttering up this navigation box with

Jnc: Jnc moved page Template talk:PDP-11 to Template talk:Nav PDP-11 without leaving a redirect: standard naming system

2021-05-23T00:38:39Z

Jnc moved page Template talk:PDP-11 to Template talk:Nav PDP-11 without leaving a redirect: standard naming system

Neozeed: New page: Talk about the PDP-11

2009-08-24T13:23:46Z

New page: Talk about the PDP-11

New page

Talk about the PDP-11

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 29 June 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I don't think the [[CTI BUS‎‎]] is important enough (it's only available on the Professional 300, not on any 'classic' PDP-11s) or different enough (from the QBUS) to be worth cluttering up this navigation box with. Neither the [[Private Memory Interconnect]], nor the [[CD interconnect]] buses, available on a lot of PDP-11's, were deemed worth listing there, so this isn't simple Pro-300 antagonism. (And there are a lot of other PDP-11 pages which aren't included wither - e.g. [[FIS floating point]], [[PDP-11 Extended Instruction Set]], [[PDP-11 Commercial Instruction Set]], etc, etc, etc - again, to avoid cluttering it up with less important topics.) So, unless there's a good reason to include the CTI BUS, I propose we leave it out. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 16:49, 28 June 2023 (CEST)		I don't think the [[CTI BUS‎‎]] is important enough (it's only available on the Professional 300, not on any 'classic' PDP-11s) or different enough (from the QBUS) to be worth cluttering up this navigation box with. Neither the [[Private Memory Interconnect]], nor the [[CD interconnect]] buses, available on a lot of PDP-11's, were deemed worth listing there, so this isn't simple Pro-300 antagonism. (And there are a lot of other PDP-11 pages which aren't included wither - e.g. [[FIS floating point]], [[PDP-11 Extended Instruction Set]], [[PDP-11 Commercial Instruction Set]], etc, etc, etc - again, to avoid cluttering it up with less important topics.) So, unless there's a good reason to include the CTI BUS, I propose we leave it out. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 16:49, 28 June 2023 (CEST)
		+
		+	I disagree; precisely because the PC 300 series was the black sheep in the PDP-11 family and the CTI-BUS was probably one of the main factors in the failure of the "Personal" PDP-11, I think the CTI-Bus is important enough for that it is explicitly stated.
		+	There are also around a dozen CTI modules for the PRO 300 series.[[User:Vaxorcist\|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist\|talk]])

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:49, 28 June 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~Talk about~~ the PDP-11	+	==Buses==
		+
		+	I don't think the [[CTI BUS‎‎]] is important enough (it's only available on the Professional 300, not on any 'classic' PDP-11s) or different enough (from the QBUS) to be worth cluttering up this navigation box with. Neither the [[Private Memory Interconnect]], nor the [[CD interconnect]] buses, available on a lot of PDP-11's, were deemed worth listing there, so this isn't simple Pro-300 antagonism. (And there are a lot of other PDP-11 pages which aren't included wither - e.g. [[FIS floating point]], [[PDP-11 Extended Instruction Set]], [[PDP-11 Commercial Instruction Set]], etc, etc, etc - again, to avoid cluttering it up with less important topics.) So, unless there's a good reason to include the CTI BUS, I propose we leave it out. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 16:49, 28 June 2023 (CEST)

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:38, 23 May 2021
(No difference)