User talk:Larsbrinkhoff - Revision history

Jnc: /* Chaosnet application protocols glitch */ Did you miss this?

2023-10-16T20:54:26Z

Chaosnet application protocols glitch: Did you miss this?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:54, 16 October 2023
Line 22:		Line 22:
	== Not individual models ==		== Not individual models ==

	Not individual models - there are hundreds of them! We'd be here all year! So only tag [[PDP-11] with [[:Category:16-bit Computers]], not [[PDP-11/30]], [[PDP-11/45]], etc. Unless there's a good reason to do individual models? (I can't think of one off the top of my head, but there might be.) [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 13:55, 11 July 2023 (CEST)		Not individual models - there are hundreds of them! We'd be here all year! So only tag [[PDP-11]] with [[:Category:16-bit Computers]], not [[PDP-11/20]], [[PDP-11/45]], etc. Unless there's a good reason to do individual models? (I can't think of one off the top of my head, but there might be.) [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 13:55, 11 July 2023 (CEST)

	: Sure. I wasn't going to touch the PDP-11s. At least not today. I did go through the PDP-8's, but they aren't as plentiful. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 13:57, 11 July 2023 (CEST)		: Sure. I wasn't going to touch the PDP-11s. At least not today. I did go through the PDP-8's, but they aren't as plentiful. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 13:57, 11 July 2023 (CEST)
Line 32:		Line 32:
	:::: Well, true, technically the KA10 is a processor - but we don't have pages for the KA10 ''models'', like the 1040. So [[KA10]] is kind of a stand-in for them (in not being categorized).		:::: Well, true, technically the KA10 is a processor - but we don't have pages for the KA10 ''models'', like the 1040. So [[KA10]] is kind of a stand-in for them (in not being categorized).
	:::: Yes, micros should be covered too. But again, as you suggest, architectures/lines, not models. So [[Motorola M68000 Family]] goes in [[:Category:32-bit Computers]], but not [[Motorola MC68000]]. I will write a few words someplace to formalize this - once I figure out what the right place is! [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 18:29, 11 July 2023 (CEST)		:::: Yes, micros should be covered too. But again, as you suggest, architectures/lines, not models. So [[Motorola M68000 Family]] goes in [[:Category:32-bit Computers]], but not [[Motorola MC68000]]. I will write a few words someplace to formalize this - once I figure out what the right place is! [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 18:29, 11 July 2023 (CEST)

			==Chaosnet application protocols glitch?==

			Did you miss [[Talk:List of Chaosnet application protocols\|this]]? [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 22:54, 16 October 2023 (CEST)

Jnc: /* Not individual models */ Yes, micros should be covered too - but, as you suggest, architectures/lines

2023-07-11T16:29:14Z

Not individual models: Yes, micros should be covered too - but, as you suggest, architectures/lines

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 11 July 2023
Line 29:		Line 29:

	::: The KA10 is arguably a processor, not a full computer. Maybe the categories should cover processors and architectures too, but I'm not in a hurry to do that now. But e.g. microprocessors like 4004, 8080, 6502 ought to have a place in this. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 15:24, 11 July 2023 (CEST)		::: The KA10 is arguably a processor, not a full computer. Maybe the categories should cover processors and architectures too, but I'm not in a hurry to do that now. But e.g. microprocessors like 4004, 8080, 6502 ought to have a place in this. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 15:24, 11 July 2023 (CEST)

			:::: Well, true, technically the KA10 is a processor - but we don't have pages for the KA10 ''models'', like the 1040. So [[KA10]] is kind of a stand-in for them (in not being categorized).
			:::: Yes, micros should be covered too. But again, as you suggest, architectures/lines, not models. So [[Motorola M68000 Family]] goes in [[:Category:32-bit Computers]], but not [[Motorola MC68000]]. I will write a few words someplace to formalize this - once I figure out what the right place is! [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 18:29, 11 July 2023 (CEST)

Larsbrinkhoff: /* Not individual models */ Microprocessors.

2023-07-11T13:26:01Z

Not individual models: Microprocessors.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:26, 11 July 2023
Line 28:		Line 28:
	:: There are also all the VAXen. I thought we had individual pages for some [[IBM System/360]] models, but apparently not. We do have [[KA10]], etc, of course. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 14:32, 11 July 2023 (CEST)		:: There are also all the VAXen. I thought we had individual pages for some [[IBM System/360]] models, but apparently not. We do have [[KA10]], etc, of course. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 14:32, 11 July 2023 (CEST)

	::: The KA10 is arguably a processor, not a full computer. Maybe the categories should cover processors and architectures too, but I'm not in a hurry to do that now. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 15:24, 11 July 2023 (CEST)		::: The KA10 is arguably a processor, not a full computer. Maybe the categories should cover processors and architectures too, but I'm not in a hurry to do that now. But e.g. microprocessors like 4004, 8080, 6502 ought to have a place in this. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 15:24, 11 July 2023 (CEST)

Larsbrinkhoff: /* Not individual models */ Processors, architectures?

2023-07-11T13:25:08Z

Not individual models: Processors, architectures?

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:25, 11 July 2023
Line 27:		Line 27:

	:: There are also all the VAXen. I thought we had individual pages for some [[IBM System/360]] models, but apparently not. We do have [[KA10]], etc, of course. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 14:32, 11 July 2023 (CEST)		:: There are also all the VAXen. I thought we had individual pages for some [[IBM System/360]] models, but apparently not. We do have [[KA10]], etc, of course. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 14:32, 11 July 2023 (CEST)

			::: The KA10 is arguably a processor, not a full computer. Maybe the categories should cover processors and architectures too, but I'm not in a hurry to do that now. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 15:24, 11 July 2023 (CEST)

Jnc: /* Not individual models */ There are some others

2023-07-11T12:32:13Z

Not individual models: There are some others

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:32, 11 July 2023
Line 25:		Line 25:

	: Sure. I wasn't going to touch the PDP-11s. At least not today. I did go through the PDP-8's, but they aren't as plentiful. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 13:57, 11 July 2023 (CEST)		: Sure. I wasn't going to touch the PDP-11s. At least not today. I did go through the PDP-8's, but they aren't as plentiful. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 13:57, 11 July 2023 (CEST)

			:: There are also all the VAXen. I thought we had individual pages for some [[IBM System/360]] models, but apparently not. We do have [[KA10]], etc, of course. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 14:32, 11 July 2023 (CEST)

Larsbrinkhoff: /* Not individual models */ Ok, not all PDP-11 models.

2023-07-11T11:58:06Z

Not individual models: Ok, not all PDP-11 models.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:58, 11 July 2023
Line 23:		Line 23:

	Not individual models - there are hundreds of them! We'd be here all year! So only tag [[PDP-11] with [[:Category:16-bit Computers]], not [[PDP-11/30]], [[PDP-11/45]], etc. Unless there's a good reason to do individual models? (I can't think of one off the top of my head, but there might be.) [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 13:55, 11 July 2023 (CEST)		Not individual models - there are hundreds of them! We'd be here all year! So only tag [[PDP-11] with [[:Category:16-bit Computers]], not [[PDP-11/30]], [[PDP-11/45]], etc. Unless there's a good reason to do individual models? (I can't think of one off the top of my head, but there might be.) [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 13:55, 11 July 2023 (CEST)

			: Sure. I wasn't going to touch the PDP-11s. At least not today. I did go through the PDP-8's, but they aren't as plentiful. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 13:57, 11 July 2023 (CEST)

Jnc: /* Not individual models */ new section

2023-07-11T11:55:33Z

Not individual models: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:55, 11 July 2023
Line 19:		Line 19:

	I dunno if you've ever read his oral history thing the CHM did, but it's worth reading; I just linked it in, at [[C. Gordon Bell]]. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 15:21, 6 April 2023 (CEST)		I dunno if you've ever read his oral history thing the CHM did, but it's worth reading; I just linked it in, at [[C. Gordon Bell]]. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 15:21, 6 April 2023 (CEST)

			== Not individual models ==

			Not individual models - there are hundreds of them! We'd be here all year! So only tag [[PDP-11] with [[:Category:16-bit Computers]], not [[PDP-11/30]], [[PDP-11/45]], etc. Unless there's a good reason to do individual models? (I can't think of one off the top of my head, but there might be.) [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 13:55, 11 July 2023 (CEST)

Jnc: /* Gordon Bell oral history */ new section

2023-04-06T13:21:46Z

Gordon Bell oral history: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:21, 6 April 2023
Line 15:		Line 15:

	: No, I had no idea there was such as thing as "autopatrol", and I never before saw that list of group rights. By all means, if it's any trouble have any appropriates properties turned on. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 19:19, 28 April 2022 (CEST)		: No, I had no idea there was such as thing as "autopatrol", and I never before saw that list of group rights. By all means, if it's any trouble have any appropriates properties turned on. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 19:19, 28 April 2022 (CEST)

			== Gordon Bell oral history ==

			I dunno if you've ever read his oral history thing the CHM did, but it's worth reading; I just linked it in, at [[C. Gordon Bell]]. [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 15:21, 6 April 2023 (CEST)

Larsbrinkhoff: /* Autopatrolled */ Autopatrol away!

2022-04-28T17:19:20Z

Autopatrolled: Autopatrol away!

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:19, 28 April 2022
Line 13:		Line 13:

	PS: I loved the 'meow' - took me a few moments to get it! [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 14:24, 28 April 2022 (CEST)		PS: I loved the 'meow' - took me a few moments to get it! [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 14:24, 28 April 2022 (CEST)

			: No, I had no idea there was such as thing as "autopatrol", and I never before saw that list of group rights. By all means, if it's any trouble have any appropriates properties turned on. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff\|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff\|talk]]) 19:19, 28 April 2022 (CEST)

Jnc: /* Autopatrolled */ It would be good to get that turned on for you

2022-04-28T12:25:14Z

Autopatrolled: It would be good to get that turned on for you

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:25, 28 April 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Please remember to sign them! :-) Thanks! [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 13:56, 9 July 2019 (CEST)		Please remember to sign them! :-) Thanks! [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 13:56, 9 July 2019 (CEST)

			==Contacting me==

	hey just saw your messages as I was about to go on an A/UX binge. Also the emacs stuff. You can email me directly neozeed <at> GOOG .... you know gmail <dot> com...		hey just saw your messages as I was about to go on an A/UX binge. Also the emacs stuff. You can email me directly neozeed <at> GOOG .... you know gmail <dot> com...
	[[User:Neozeed\|neozeed]] ([[User talk:Neozeed\|talk]]) 06:42, 8 September 2021 (CEST)		[[User:Neozeed\|neozeed]] ([[User talk:Neozeed\|talk]]) 06:42, 8 September 2021 (CEST)

			==Autopatrolled==

			I was going to try and turn on [[Special:ListGroupRights\|Autopatrolled]] for you, so I don't have to do that for your edits, but apparently as a mere 'administrator' I can't do that, only 'bureaucrats' can. Maybe I'll drop Tore a line, and ask him to do it. (I think as a mere 'user' you can't see the 'unpatrolled edit' marker in [[Special:RecentChanges]]; ISTR I did an experiment from another non-admin account - my wife's - to check if they showed up.)

			PS: I loved the 'meow' - took me a few moments to get it! [[User:Jnc\|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc\|talk]]) 14:24, 28 April 2022 (CEST)