Difference between revisions of "Help talk:Categories"
From Computer History Wiki
(OK - and a cat for all DEC stuff?) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
BTW, I added some thoughts about cats to [[Help:Introduction to Categories#Current organization]] - does that seem like a good system? [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 19:44, 19 February 2018 (CET) | BTW, I added some thoughts about cats to [[Help:Introduction to Categories#Current organization]] - does that seem like a good system? [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 19:44, 19 February 2018 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : DEC is consistent with the other labels. | ||
| + | : There's one problem with the taxonomy. Not all PDP-10 (or 11 or 8) operating systems are DEC operating system. At least not in the sense "operating systems made by DEC". | ||
Revision as of 20:14, 19 February 2018
Peripherals/Devices
Hi, I'm getting set to create categories for PDP-10 and PDP-11 peripherals/devices (I've been doing a lot of organization on the CPU/system/etc end of things, and have that in pretty good shape now). Which word would be better to use, if you have an opinion - 'peripherals' or 'devices'? We current do already have a Category:Peripherals, so maybe go with that? Jnc (talk) 16:05, 19 February 2018 (CET)
- I tend to go with 'peripherals' in this case. Larsbrinkhoff (talk)
OK; I'll get started on that. And also, I think we should have a category for all DEC stuff - just plain 'DEC', or 'Digital Equipment Corporation'?
BTW, I added some thoughts about cats to Help:Introduction to Categories#Current organization - does that seem like a good system? Jnc (talk) 19:44, 19 February 2018 (CET)
- DEC is consistent with the other labels.
- There's one problem with the taxonomy. Not all PDP-10 (or 11 or 8) operating systems are DEC operating system. At least not in the sense "operating systems made by DEC".
