Difference between revisions of "Talk:Logo"
From Computer History Wiki
(Move it if you like!) |
(→Caps?: OK, done) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:: I'm not overly concerned about these things myself, but others care deeply about LISP vs Lisp, ARPANET, etc. I'll leave it to someone like that to decide. In this case the evidence seem to point to "Logo" being the most historically correct. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff|talk]]) 13:42, 18 May 2018 (CEST) | :: I'm not overly concerned about these things myself, but others care deeply about LISP vs Lisp, ARPANET, etc. I'll leave it to someone like that to decide. In this case the evidence seem to point to "Logo" being the most historically correct. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff|talk]]) 13:42, 18 May 2018 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: OK, done. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 13:46, 18 May 2018 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:46, 18 May 2018
Caps?
I got chided by Leigh Klotz for writing LOGO rather than Logo, because it's not an acronym. I figure he has some authority in the matter, since he was part of the Logo group at MIT. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 08:56, 18 May 2018 (CEST)
- Byte magazine (wait - BYTE magazine!) August 1982, the "Logo" issue, spells it "Logo" and not "LOGO" as I thought I remembered. So, yes I guess. Tor (talk) 09:59, 18 May 2018 (CEST)
- I'm not overly concerned about these things myself, but others care deeply about LISP vs Lisp, ARPANET, etc. I'll leave it to someone like that to decide. In this case the evidence seem to point to "Logo" being the most historically correct. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 13:42, 18 May 2018 (CEST)
