Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chaosnet"
From Computer History Wiki
m (Jnc moved page Talk:CHAOSnet to Talk:Chaosnet without leaving a redirect: Original docs use this capitalization) |
(→CH10 on a KL10: Chaosnet connectivity according to ITS source code.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'm pretty sure that the MC KL10 was attached to the CHAOSNet via the I/O -11; there was never a PDP-10 I/O bus CHAOSNet interface on it. (Not that one couldn't have been done, of course.) [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 10:06, 24 August 2021 (CEST) | I'm pretty sure that the MC KL10 was attached to the CHAOSNet via the I/O -11; there was never a PDP-10 I/O bus CHAOSNet interface on it. (Not that one couldn't have been done, of course.) [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 10:06, 24 August 2021 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : That is consistent with archived source code. AI and MC both had an IO-11 front end; AI's through the Rubin 10-11 interface, MC's through DL10. Only ML had an IO bus device called CH10. DM had no Chaosnet. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff|talk]]) 11:17, 27 October 2021 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 10:17, 27 October 2021
CH10 on a KL10
I'm pretty sure that the MC KL10 was attached to the CHAOSNet via the I/O -11; there was never a PDP-10 I/O bus CHAOSNet interface on it. (Not that one couldn't have been done, of course.) Jnc (talk) 10:06, 24 August 2021 (CEST)
- That is consistent with archived source code. AI and MC both had an IO-11 front end; AI's through the Rubin 10-11 interface, MC's through DL10. Only ML had an IO bus device called CH10. DM had no Chaosnet. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 11:17, 27 October 2021 (CEST)
