Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Chaos"

From Computer History Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Protocol versus hardware?)
 
m (Protocol versus hardware: fix link)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
The header for this category says it's for 'Chaos protocol' stuff, not Chaos hardware; but [[Chaosnet interface]] just got put here? I am thinking of re-naming this one to 'Chaos Protocol'; and also maybe setting up a new 'Chaos Hardware' category?
 
The header for this category says it's for 'Chaos protocol' stuff, not Chaos hardware; but [[Chaosnet interface]] just got put here? I am thinking of re-naming this one to 'Chaos Protocol'; and also maybe setting up a new 'Chaos Hardware' category?
  
I had previously [[Chaosnet#Chaos hardware and protocol|explored]] the possibility of splitting the [[Chaosnet]] article into separate 'Chaos protocol' and 'Chaos hardware' articles, but I had decided not to, because some of the content, like the early history, would not easily split (so either it would have to be duplicated, or moved into a ''third'' article). Maybe we should just bite the bullet and split it? [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 16:10, 30 July 2024 (CEST)
+
I had previously [[Talk:Chaosnet#Chaos hardware and protocol|explored]] the possibility of splitting the [[Chaosnet]] article into separate 'Chaos protocol' and 'Chaos hardware' articles, but I had decided not to, because some of the content, like the early history, would not easily split (so either it would have to be duplicated, or moved into a ''third'' article). Maybe we should just bite the bullet and split it? [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 16:10, 30 July 2024 (CEST)

Revision as of 17:04, 30 July 2024

Protocol versus hardware

The header for this category says it's for 'Chaos protocol' stuff, not Chaos hardware; but Chaosnet interface just got put here? I am thinking of re-naming this one to 'Chaos Protocol'; and also maybe setting up a new 'Chaos Hardware' category?

I had previously explored the possibility of splitting the Chaosnet article into separate 'Chaos protocol' and 'Chaos hardware' articles, but I had decided not to, because some of the content, like the early history, would not easily split (so either it would have to be duplicated, or moved into a third article). Maybe we should just bite the bullet and split it? Jnc (talk) 16:10, 30 July 2024 (CEST)