Difference between revisions of "Talk:Instruction"
From Computer History Wiki
(→Order/order code: That terminology was actually more common in the UK) |
(→Order/order code: Where should I look for PDP-1 usage?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I actually have the impression that the 'order/order code' terminology was more common in the UK; at Cambridge (see [https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/relics/orders.notes.html The EDSAC Order Code], and descendants such as the [[LEO]]); and at Manchester (see [https://www.cs.man.ac.uk/CCS/res/res02.htm From Cathode Ray Tube to Ferranti Mark I]). In the US, [[Whirlwind]] mostly used 'instruction' and 'operation code'. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 13:11, 4 November 2025 (UTC) | I actually have the impression that the 'order/order code' terminology was more common in the UK; at Cambridge (see [https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/relics/orders.notes.html The EDSAC Order Code], and descendants such as the [[LEO]]); and at Manchester (see [https://www.cs.man.ac.uk/CCS/res/res02.htm From Cathode Ray Tube to Ferranti Mark I]). In the US, [[Whirlwind]] mostly used 'instruction' and 'operation code'. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 13:11, 4 November 2025 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I had a look through some [[PDP-1]] documentation, but didn't see 'order' being used. Where should I look? [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 19:10, 5 November 2025 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:10, 5 November 2025
Order/order code
I actually have the impression that the 'order/order code' terminology was more common in the UK; at Cambridge (see The EDSAC Order Code, and descendants such as the LEO); and at Manchester (see From Cathode Ray Tube to Ferranti Mark I). In the US, Whirlwind mostly used 'instruction' and 'operation code'. Jnc (talk) 13:11, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
I had a look through some PDP-1 documentation, but didn't see 'order' being used. Where should I look? Jnc (talk) 19:10, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
