Difference between revisions of "Thread"

From Computer History Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (+cat)
(Kernel threads; threads usually have stacks)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The term '''thread''' does not have a generally accepted firm/strict definition, but it generally means an [[instruction]] [[execute|execution]] locus which is less powerful (in terms of its capabilities) than a [[process]]; e.g. a thread will generally not have its own [[address space]].
 
The term '''thread''' does not have a generally accepted firm/strict definition, but it generally means an [[instruction]] [[execute|execution]] locus which is less powerful (in terms of its capabilities) than a [[process]]; e.g. a thread will generally not have its own [[address space]].
  
Threads are usually instantiated within a process, and share its [[memory]], [[input/output|I/O]] channels, etc. All the threads in a particular process exhibit [[fate-sharing]]: if the process is terminated, all the threads within it necessarily are also lost.
+
Threads are usually instantiated within a process, and share its [[memory]], [[input/output|I/O]] channels, etc. Threads do seem to usually have individual, per-thread, [[stack]]s, so that a thread can cease executing while down a [[subroutine call]] chain, and later resume executing at the exact point where it paused. (Thread-like abstractions without stacks are sometimes called '''fibers'''.)
  
 +
All the threads in a particular process exhibit [[fate-sharing]]: if the process is terminated, all the threads within it necessarily are also lost.
 +
 
Threads are often, but not always, supported by the [[kernel]] of an [[operating system]]; e.g. the system's [[scheduler]] may be prepared to run threads. If not, a [[library]] included in the process may manage them.
 
Threads are often, but not always, supported by the [[kernel]] of an [[operating system]]; e.g. the system's [[scheduler]] may be prepared to run threads. If not, a [[library]] included in the process may manage them.
  
 
In [[multi-processor]] systems where the kernel supports threads, it may be allowed for multiple threads in a single process to execute concurrently.
 
In [[multi-processor]] systems where the kernel supports threads, it may be allowed for multiple threads in a single process to execute concurrently.
 +
 +
Threads may also exist as abstractions inside the kernel (named '''kernel threads'''), for use in structuring of work inside the kernel.
  
 
{{semi-stub}}
 
{{semi-stub}}
 +
 +
==See also==
 +
 +
* [[Kernel process]]
  
 
[[Category: OS Basics]]
 
[[Category: OS Basics]]

Latest revision as of 17:25, 15 December 2023

The term thread does not have a generally accepted firm/strict definition, but it generally means an instruction execution locus which is less powerful (in terms of its capabilities) than a process; e.g. a thread will generally not have its own address space.

Threads are usually instantiated within a process, and share its memory, I/O channels, etc. Threads do seem to usually have individual, per-thread, stacks, so that a thread can cease executing while down a subroutine call chain, and later resume executing at the exact point where it paused. (Thread-like abstractions without stacks are sometimes called fibers.)

All the threads in a particular process exhibit fate-sharing: if the process is terminated, all the threads within it necessarily are also lost.

Threads are often, but not always, supported by the kernel of an operating system; e.g. the system's scheduler may be prepared to run threads. If not, a library included in the process may manage them.

In multi-processor systems where the kernel supports threads, it may be allowed for multiple threads in a single process to execute concurrently.

Threads may also exist as abstractions inside the kernel (named kernel threads), for use in structuring of work inside the kernel.

See also