Talk:Microprocessor: Difference between revisions
From Computer History Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m typo |
→Another meaning: Awaiting more evidence. |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: Hunh. I have never heard that one; I've always heard the term 'microcoded' for that. I wouldn't mind listing it as 'rare second meaning', if you think it's desirable. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 21:57, 7 April 2021 (CEST) | : Hunh. I have never heard that one; I've always heard the term 'microcoded' for that. I wouldn't mind listing it as 'rare second meaning', if you think it's desirable. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 21:57, 7 April 2021 (CEST) | ||
:: Thanks. I think I'd like to see at least one occurrence outside Xerox PART for it to be worthwhile. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff|talk]]) 07:39, 8 April 2021 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 05:39, 8 April 2021
Another meaning
"Microprocessor" also meant "microcoded processor" in some circles. I have seen it used about the Alto and MAXC processors, so maybe it was a PARC thing. If those two examples are all I can find, I will not bring it up any more. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 20:56, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
- Hunh. I have never heard that one; I've always heard the term 'microcoded' for that. I wouldn't mind listing it as 'rare second meaning', if you think it's desirable. Jnc (talk) 21:57, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
- Thanks. I think I'd like to see at least one occurrence outside Xerox PART for it to be worthwhile. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 07:39, 8 April 2021 (CEST)
