Difference between revisions of "Talk:PDP-11"
From Computer History Wiki
(The PDP-11/10 _was_ introduced in 1972...) |
(Ok - what about the /20?) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Since hundreds (literally) of DEC manuals, books, etc use "PDP-11/10" to | Since hundreds (literally) of DEC manuals, books, etc use "PDP-11/10" to | ||
refer to the one with the KD11-B processor, not the 'marketing artifact' from 1969 with the name "PDP-11/10" and a KA-11 CPU, and since there are many physical machines still extant with "PDP-11/10" on them, and a KD11-B inside, I think it would be very misleading to show the PDP-11/10 as having been introduced in 1969. We should put it back the way it was, and include a footnote in small print to show that the name had been recycled from the earlier one. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 23:05, 22 February 2016 (CET) | refer to the one with the KD11-B processor, not the 'marketing artifact' from 1969 with the name "PDP-11/10" and a KA-11 CPU, and since there are many physical machines still extant with "PDP-11/10" on them, and a KD11-B inside, I think it would be very misleading to show the PDP-11/10 as having been introduced in 1969. We should put it back the way it was, and include a footnote in small print to show that the name had been recycled from the earlier one. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 23:05, 22 February 2016 (CET) | ||
| + | :Ah, ok. What about the /20, is the /20 in the 1969 ad what's generally known as /20? [[User:Tor|Tor]] ([[User talk:Tor|talk]]) 08:20, 23 February 2016 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 08:20, 23 February 2016
PDP-11/10
Since hundreds (literally) of DEC manuals, books, etc use "PDP-11/10" to refer to the one with the KD11-B processor, not the 'marketing artifact' from 1969 with the name "PDP-11/10" and a KA-11 CPU, and since there are many physical machines still extant with "PDP-11/10" on them, and a KD11-B inside, I think it would be very misleading to show the PDP-11/10 as having been introduced in 1969. We should put it back the way it was, and include a footnote in small print to show that the name had been recycled from the earlier one. Jnc (talk) 23:05, 22 February 2016 (CET)
