Difference between revisions of "Talk:BCC 500"
From Computer History Wiki
(→Macrocode: new section) |
(→Macrocode: Maybe a Lispm word.) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I'm not sure if 'macrocode' is the ''preferred'' single-word term for the higher-level [[instruction set architecture]] instructions, but I'm having a hard time thinking what would be the preferred single-word term. In this context, 'macrocode' is certainly readily ''understandable''. I wouldn't worry about it. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 13:16, 23 April 2022 (CEST) | I'm not sure if 'macrocode' is the ''preferred'' single-word term for the higher-level [[instruction set architecture]] instructions, but I'm having a hard time thinking what would be the preferred single-word term. In this context, 'macrocode' is certainly readily ''understandable''. I wouldn't worry about it. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 13:16, 23 April 2022 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Thanks. I know it's used with the MIT lineage Lisp machines, but perhaps not elsewhere. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff|talk]]) 15:21, 23 April 2022 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 14:21, 23 April 2022
Further reading
Dealers of Lightning has a certain amount of material on BCC; see the index. Jnc (talk) 04:21, 22 October 2021 (CEST)
- Thanks, I read it earlier this year. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 07:02, 22 October 2021 (CEST)
Macrocode
I'm not sure if 'macrocode' is the preferred single-word term for the higher-level instruction set architecture instructions, but I'm having a hard time thinking what would be the preferred single-word term. In this context, 'macrocode' is certainly readily understandable. I wouldn't worry about it. Jnc (talk) 13:16, 23 April 2022 (CEST)
- Thanks. I know it's used with the MIT lineage Lisp machines, but perhaps not elsewhere. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 15:21, 23 April 2022 (CEST)
