Difference between revisions of "Category talk:DEC Serial Interfaces"
From Computer History Wiki
(→Separate synchronous and asynchronous?) |
(Yes, DEC serial interfaces categories need some work) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Should there be separate categories for synchronous and asynchronous serial interfaces? We already have [[:Category:UNIBUS Serial Interfaces]] and [[:Category:QBUS Serial Interfaces]], but they both contain both synchronous and asynchronous serial interfaces. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 11:58, 15 August 2022 (CEST) | Should there be separate categories for synchronous and asynchronous serial interfaces? We already have [[:Category:UNIBUS Serial Interfaces]] and [[:Category:QBUS Serial Interfaces]], but they both contain both synchronous and asynchronous serial interfaces. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 11:58, 15 August 2022 (CEST) | ||
− | Well, there are some controllers for busless systems like the MicroVax 2000 / VAXstation 2000 for example. As those don't fit into neither QBUS nor UNIBUS I created a new category. Yes, I thought of subcategories for synchronous / asynchronous serial interfaces (and there are interfaces that implement both, e.g. the DMF32), but did not implement it yet. | + | : Well, there are some controllers for busless systems like the MicroVax 2000 / VAXstation 2000 for example. As those don't fit into neither QBUS nor UNIBUS I created a new category. Yes, I thought of subcategories for synchronous / asynchronous serial interfaces (and there are interfaces that implement both, e.g. the DMF32), but did not implement it yet. |
+ | : I think I should rather call it "DEC Busless Communication Controllers"... By the way: Is "busless" the correct word? Could you please rename it if "busless" is correct (or suggest another word)? | ||
+ | : Maybe there should be a kind of "Super"-Category "DEC Communication Controllers" (my old category name) for all types - bus-based or busless? [[User:Vaxorcist|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist|talk]]) 12:16, 15 August 2022 (CEST) | ||
− | + | :: Yes; we clearly need a category the 'bus-less' ones can go into. Whether that is a separate category ('Non-bus Serial Interfaces'), or they just go into a parent 'Serial Interfaces' category, I do not know (yet). | |
− | + | :: My question about separate categories for synchronous and asynchronous interfaces was background for a more complete re-arrangement of the 'DEC Serial Interfaces' categories (although I did not make that clear - I was just waking up :-). It would be appropriate to have a parent category for them all - although I am not sure 'Communication Controllers' is it. | |
− | + | :: To me, network interfaces are 'communication controllers' also. Did DEC have an accepted term to cover them all? In the PDP-11 era they just called them 'Asynchronous Communications Interfaces' and 'Synchronous Communications Interfaces' (and included Ethernet in the latter :-). | |
+ | :: So maybe something like 'DEC Serial Interfaces', with two different sets of sub-categories: | ||
+ | ::* DEC Asynchronous Serial Interfaces, DEC Synchronous Serial Interfaces | ||
+ | ::* UNIBUS Serial Interfaces, QBUS Serial Interfaces, etc | ||
+ | :: and all pages go into two categories. (The alternative is to have N^2 categories - 'QBUS Asynchronous Serial Interfaces', etc - and pages only go into one; but previous discussion on a similar question - see [[Help talk:Introduction to Categories#Other cats|here]] - seemed to agree that it's better to have fewer tiny categories, and double-categorize articles.) [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 15:17, 15 August 2022 (CEST) |
Revision as of 14:18, 15 August 2022
Separate synchronous and asynchronous?
Should there be separate categories for synchronous and asynchronous serial interfaces? We already have Category:UNIBUS Serial Interfaces and Category:QBUS Serial Interfaces, but they both contain both synchronous and asynchronous serial interfaces. Jnc (talk) 11:58, 15 August 2022 (CEST)
- Well, there are some controllers for busless systems like the MicroVax 2000 / VAXstation 2000 for example. As those don't fit into neither QBUS nor UNIBUS I created a new category. Yes, I thought of subcategories for synchronous / asynchronous serial interfaces (and there are interfaces that implement both, e.g. the DMF32), but did not implement it yet.
- I think I should rather call it "DEC Busless Communication Controllers"... By the way: Is "busless" the correct word? Could you please rename it if "busless" is correct (or suggest another word)?
- Maybe there should be a kind of "Super"-Category "DEC Communication Controllers" (my old category name) for all types - bus-based or busless? Vaxorcist (talk) 12:16, 15 August 2022 (CEST)
- Yes; we clearly need a category the 'bus-less' ones can go into. Whether that is a separate category ('Non-bus Serial Interfaces'), or they just go into a parent 'Serial Interfaces' category, I do not know (yet).
- My question about separate categories for synchronous and asynchronous interfaces was background for a more complete re-arrangement of the 'DEC Serial Interfaces' categories (although I did not make that clear - I was just waking up :-). It would be appropriate to have a parent category for them all - although I am not sure 'Communication Controllers' is it.
- To me, network interfaces are 'communication controllers' also. Did DEC have an accepted term to cover them all? In the PDP-11 era they just called them 'Asynchronous Communications Interfaces' and 'Synchronous Communications Interfaces' (and included Ethernet in the latter :-).
- So maybe something like 'DEC Serial Interfaces', with two different sets of sub-categories:
- DEC Asynchronous Serial Interfaces, DEC Synchronous Serial Interfaces
- UNIBUS Serial Interfaces, QBUS Serial Interfaces, etc
- and all pages go into two categories. (The alternative is to have N^2 categories - 'QBUS Asynchronous Serial Interfaces', etc - and pages only go into one; but previous discussion on a similar question - see here - seemed to agree that it's better to have fewer tiny categories, and double-categorize articles.) Jnc (talk) 15:17, 15 August 2022 (CEST)