Difference between revisions of "Talk:ARPANET"

From Computer History Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Time to add an ARPANET catgory?)
 
(Category?: Also will do Category: 1822 Interfaces)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
Reactions? [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 15:58, 4 November 2021 (CET)
 
Reactions? [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 15:58, 4 November 2021 (CET)
 +
 +
Done: [[:Category: ARPANET]]. Some (e.g. [[Terminal Interface Unit]], which is more of an Internet device, really) didn't go there, but they were all tweaked, and their cat(s) carefully considered. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 14:21, 7 November 2021 (CET)
 +
 +
: Sorry, completely missed this but I agree it's a good idea now that there are many more ARPANET related pages. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff|talk]]) 11:07, 8 November 2021 (CET)
 +
 +
: And given that we have a lot of 1822 interfaces, many of which were in fact also used on the PRNET (on the PDP-11/40/ELF base stations BBN used, I suspect, the IMP-11A; on the TIUs, SRI used the Stanford and MLH-DH/LSI11 interfaces; PARC used the Alto one - which I may do an article on, after looking through the Alto 1822 archive), I think I'll create a [[:Category: 1822 Interfaces]], which I can add to all the appropriate categories (such as [[:Category: ARPANET]]). [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 15:23, 8 November 2021 (CET)

Latest revision as of 16:23, 8 November 2021

Category?

Currently ARPANET stuff is all getting put in Category: Networking, but I'm thinking it's worth setting up a separate category for them (there are now enough to make it worth it, I think). These are all candidates for being moved:

Reactions? Jnc (talk) 15:58, 4 November 2021 (CET)

Done: Category: ARPANET. Some (e.g. Terminal Interface Unit, which is more of an Internet device, really) didn't go there, but they were all tweaked, and their cat(s) carefully considered. Jnc (talk) 14:21, 7 November 2021 (CET)

Sorry, completely missed this but I agree it's a good idea now that there are many more ARPANET related pages. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 11:07, 8 November 2021 (CET)
And given that we have a lot of 1822 interfaces, many of which were in fact also used on the PRNET (on the PDP-11/40/ELF base stations BBN used, I suspect, the IMP-11A; on the TIUs, SRI used the Stanford and MLH-DH/LSI11 interfaces; PARC used the Alto one - which I may do an article on, after looking through the Alto 1822 archive), I think I'll create a Category: 1822 Interfaces, which I can add to all the appropriate categories (such as Category: ARPANET). Jnc (talk) 15:23, 8 November 2021 (CET)