Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Nav PDP-11"

From Computer History Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Jnc moved page Template talk:PDP-11 to Template talk:Nav PDP-11 without leaving a redirect: standard naming system)
(Buses: CTI BUS‎‎ is not important enough to be worth cluttering up this navigation box with)
Line 1: Line 1:
Talk about the PDP-11
+
==Buses==
 +
 
 +
I don't think the [[CTI BUS‎‎]] is important enough (it's only available on the Professional 300, not on any 'classic' PDP-11s) or different enough (from the QBUS) to be worth cluttering up this navigation box with. Neither the [[Private Memory Interconnect]], nor the [[CD interconnect]] buses, available on a lot of PDP-11's, were deemed worth listing there, so this isn't simple Pro-300 antagonism. (And there are a lot of other PDP-11 pages which aren't included wither - e.g. [[FIS floating point]], [[PDP-11 Extended Instruction Set]], [[PDP-11 Commercial Instruction Set]], etc, etc, etc - again, to avoid cluttering it up with less important topics.) So, unless there's a good reason to include the CTI BUS, I propose we leave it out. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 16:49, 28 June 2023 (CEST)

Revision as of 16:49, 28 June 2023

Buses

I don't think the CTI BUS‎‎ is important enough (it's only available on the Professional 300, not on any 'classic' PDP-11s) or different enough (from the QBUS) to be worth cluttering up this navigation box with. Neither the Private Memory Interconnect, nor the CD interconnect buses, available on a lot of PDP-11's, were deemed worth listing there, so this isn't simple Pro-300 antagonism. (And there are a lot of other PDP-11 pages which aren't included wither - e.g. FIS floating point, PDP-11 Extended Instruction Set, PDP-11 Commercial Instruction Set, etc, etc, etc - again, to avoid cluttering it up with less important topics.) So, unless there's a good reason to include the CTI BUS, I propose we leave it out. Jnc (talk) 16:49, 28 June 2023 (CEST)