Difference between revisions of "Talk:DDT"
From Computer History Wiki
(My suggestion.) |
(Guessing name came from DEC.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Other DDTs== | ||
| + | |||
How should we best separate this DDT from CP/M DDT (Dynamic Debugging Tool)? [[User:Tor|Tor]] ([[User talk:Tor|talk]]) 13:36, 7 October 2019 (CEST) | How should we best separate this DDT from CP/M DDT (Dynamic Debugging Tool)? [[User:Tor|Tor]] ([[User talk:Tor|talk]]) 13:36, 7 October 2019 (CEST) | ||
| − | : I would suggest this page be for all debuggers named DDT or similar, and those having a similar user interface to a DDT. So there could be separate sections for "DEC" style DDT and the CP/M DDT. If the page becomes too long or cluttered, split off separate pages. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff|talk]]) 13:45, 7 October 2019 (CEST) | + | : I would suggest this page be for all debuggers named DDT or similar, and those having a similar user interface to a DDT. So there could be separate sections for "DEC" style DDT and the CP/M DDT. If the page becomes too long or cluttered, split off separate pages. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff|talk]]) 13:45, 7 October 2019 (CEST)+ |
| + | |||
| + | : Concur. I wonder if the CP/M one's name was inspired by the original (even if the command set was different)? I suppose it's possible they came up with the name completely independently (the name is obviously a play on the insecticide), but I wouldn't bet on that. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 13:54, 7 October 2019 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: I don't know much about CP/M, but in my impression is seems largely inspired by TOPS-10 and/or similar DEC systems. I would think it highly likely Digital Research knew about the DEC family of DDTs. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff|talk]]) 13:59, 7 October 2019 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:59, 7 October 2019
Other DDTs
How should we best separate this DDT from CP/M DDT (Dynamic Debugging Tool)? Tor (talk) 13:36, 7 October 2019 (CEST)
- I would suggest this page be for all debuggers named DDT or similar, and those having a similar user interface to a DDT. So there could be separate sections for "DEC" style DDT and the CP/M DDT. If the page becomes too long or cluttered, split off separate pages. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 13:45, 7 October 2019 (CEST)+
- Concur. I wonder if the CP/M one's name was inspired by the original (even if the command set was different)? I suppose it's possible they came up with the name completely independently (the name is obviously a play on the insecticide), but I wouldn't bet on that. Jnc (talk) 13:54, 7 October 2019 (CEST)
- I don't know much about CP/M, but in my impression is seems largely inspired by TOPS-10 and/or similar DEC systems. I would think it highly likely Digital Research knew about the DEC family of DDTs. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 13:59, 7 October 2019 (CEST)
