Difference between revisions of "Talk:4.2 BSD"
From Computer History Wiki
(→orbit: August 1983?) |
m (→orbit) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
: SunOS 2.0 and 3.0 are 4.2 from what I recall. And they most certainly use the 68000 instruction set. They would be the most likely target. [[User:Neozeed|neozeed]] ([[User talk:Neozeed|talk]]) 02:50, 19 October 2019 (CEST) | : SunOS 2.0 and 3.0 are 4.2 from what I recall. And they most certainly use the 68000 instruction set. They would be the most likely target. [[User:Neozeed|neozeed]] ([[User talk:Neozeed|talk]]) 02:50, 19 October 2019 (CEST) | ||
| − | :: Thanks. But what about the date, August 1983? Isn't that pre-1.0? | + | :: Thanks. But what about the date, August 1983? Isn't that pre-1.0? [[User:Larsbrinkhoff|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff|talk]]) 07:47, 21 October 2019 (CEST) |
Revision as of 06:47, 21 October 2019
orbit
I have a game called "orbit". The README says "This should work with no changes on Berkeley 4.2". The graphics seem to be raster bitmaps. I see references to "sun", and not as a star. There is 68000 assembly code in it. Timestamps are August 22, 1983. I don't suppose there's a 4.2BSD for a Sun workstation? Tarball here: https://github.com/PDP-10/Spacewar/blob/not-pdp10/orbit.tar.gz?raw=true Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 17:31, 15 October 2019 (CEST)
- Mystery solved: http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2019-October/050060.html Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 13:30, 18 October 2019 (CEST)
- SunOS 2.0 and 3.0 are 4.2 from what I recall. And they most certainly use the 68000 instruction set. They would be the most likely target. neozeed (talk) 02:50, 19 October 2019 (CEST)
- Thanks. But what about the date, August 1983? Isn't that pre-1.0? Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 07:47, 21 October 2019 (CEST)
