Difference between revisions of "Talk:Network Control Program (ARPANET)"

From Computer History Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(POSIX/Linux version: Ah, makes sense)
(MOS NCP?: new section)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
: Ah, makes sense. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 15:20, 18 October 2021 (CEST)
 
: Ah, makes sense. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 15:20, 18 October 2021 (CEST)
 +
 +
== MOS NCP? ==
 +
 +
I'm pretty sure there wasn't one. Both the TIU and PE had [[Host-to-IMP Protocol]] implementations, of course, but that's only the bottom layer of a complete NCP stack, which also included the ICP and AHHP. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 15:54, 19 October 2021 (CEST)

Revision as of 14:54, 19 October 2021

Preserved implementations

Multics and TOPS-20 (and I think maybe TOPS-10 too) have been preserved, and run under emulators, but I don't know if their NCP's were included in what was preserved. Jnc (talk) 13:53, 15 October 2021 (CEST)

Yes, TOPS-10 is also alive and well. Many versions too: at least some of 5.x, 6.x, and 7.x. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2021 (CEST)

POSIX/Linux version

You're officially insane! :-) Jnc (talk) 14:40, 18 October 2021 (CEST)

I actually wanted to make a small ARPANET using the SIMH IMP emulator, with some historical hosts like ITS and WAITS. But to do that I first need to have a good debug tool, so might as well make it an NCP suite. It remains to be seen how far it can go. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 15:18, 18 October 2021 (CEST)
Ah, makes sense. Jnc (talk) 15:20, 18 October 2021 (CEST)

MOS NCP?

I'm pretty sure there wasn't one. Both the TIU and PE had Host-to-IMP Protocol implementations, of course, but that's only the bottom layer of a complete NCP stack, which also included the ICP and AHHP. Jnc (talk) 15:54, 19 October 2021 (CEST)