Difference between revisions of "Talk:HSC50 Hierarchical Storage Controller"
From Computer History Wiki
(→HSC50 Naming) |
(→HSC50 Naming) |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:: By the way - I like the way we're debating such things as if they were really important! [[User:Vaxorcist|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist|talk]]) 16:42, 23 August 2022 (CEST) | :: By the way - I like the way we're debating such things as if they were really important! [[User:Vaxorcist|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist|talk]]) 16:42, 23 August 2022 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: Another thought: What does the "DEC Acronyms Book" say in this matter? [[User:Vaxorcist|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist|talk]]) 16:55, 23 August 2022 (CEST) |
Revision as of 15:55, 23 August 2022
HSC50 Naming
DEC usually called all its HSCs "Hierarchical Storage Controller"; the term "Mass-Storage Controller" was only used to describe what HSCs do. DEC wanted to distinguish clearly between "ordinary" Mass-Storage Controllers (UDA50, KDA50, ...) and CI-based HSC controllers or other Cluster storage controllers (like HSDxx, HSGxx, HSJxx, ...) .
I would propose renaming the HSC50 page to "HSC50 Hierarchical Storage Controller". Vaxorcist (talk) 11:29, 23 August 2022 (CEST)
- I got the "HSC50 Mass-Storage Controller' from the HSC50 Maintenance Guide (pg. 1). However, I see that the HSC50 User Guide calls it the "HSC50 Mass Storage Server" (Preface, pg. v). So, several DEC documents about the HSC50 disagree about the 'Controller'/'Server', but do agree on the 'Mass Storage'!
- To add to the confusion, 'Controller' would seem to be preferred from the name, "HSC" - but if we are to rely on that as a guide, then we should go with 'Hierarchical'!!
- Do you know of any DEC documents that give the formal name of the HSC50 to be 'HSC50 Hierarchical Storage Controller'?
- I personally do not care at all whether the page is named 'HSC50 Mass-Storage Controller' or 'HSC50 Hierarchical Storage Controller'; either would be fine with me. As usual, I care less what is logical, than what is historically accurate - what DEC itself actually called the thing at the time.
- And, as usual, contradictory evidence of what that was leaves us in the dark! Jnc (talk) 13:22, 23 August 2022 (CEST)
- I found seven occurrances of "Hierarchical Storage Controller", and for the sake of the Acronym "HSC", I would like that.
- EK-HSCMA-SV-001 HSC Service Manual, page 21 (2*)
- EK-HSCMA-SV-002 HSC Service Manual, page 21
- EK-HSCMN-IN-001 HSC Installation Manual, page 9
- EK-HSCMN-IN-002 HSC Installation Manual, pages 13, 17, 18
- R. Lary and R. Bean, "The Hierarchical Storage Controller, A Tightly Coupled Multiprocessor as Storage Server," Digital Technical Journal, vol. 1, no. 8 (February 1989): 8-24.
- AA-GMEAA-TK HSC User Guide HSC50 V2.50 HSC70 V1.00-O, page 341:
- HSC - Hierarchical Storage Controller
- An intelligent mass storage server used on the Computer Interconnect (CI) bus.
- capable of supporting a total of eight and/or tape data channels, the HSC is part of the System Interconnect Architecture and DIGITAL Storage Architecture
- By performing as an I/O manager, the HSC can be classified as an I/O server, removing the burden of I/O management from the CPU.
- Oh, I don't doubt that 'HSC' (on its own) was normally expanded to 'Hierarchical Storage Controller' by DEC - but that is a subtly different question from 'what was DEC's formal name for the HSC50'. It is certainly illogical that they called the HSC50 anything other than 'Hierarchical Storage Controller' - but there are two HSC50 documents that do just that! (And the fact that those names are capitalized there argues that they are - or are intended to be - formal names, and not just descriptive phrases which are appended to "HSC50" to indicate what an HSC50 was.)
- Of course, one could well conclude from that variability that DEC did not have a formal name for the HSC50 - other than "HSC50". Anyway, let me go look at those manuals you found. Jnc (talk) 16:34, 23 August 2022 (CEST)
- I would judge that the article in the Digital Technical Journal is of special importance. Furthermore I would like to draw the attention to the difference between what "something is" and what "something is named".