Difference between revisions of "Talk:HSC50 Hierarchical Storage Controller"
From Computer History Wiki
(Created page with "==HSC50 Naming== DEC usually called all its HSCs "Hierarchical Storage Controller"; the term "Mass-Storage Controller" was only used to describe what HSCs do. DEC wanted to d...") |
(→HSC50 Naming: "Intelligent" is DEC's own term) |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I would propose renaming the HSC50 page to "HSC50 Hierarchical Storage Controller". [[User:Vaxorcist|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist|talk]]) 11:29, 23 August 2022 (CEST) | I would propose renaming the HSC50 page to "HSC50 Hierarchical Storage Controller". [[User:Vaxorcist|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist|talk]]) 11:29, 23 August 2022 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : I got the "HSC50 Mass-Storage Controller' from the [http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/dsa/hsc/AA-P672A-TK_HSC50_Maintenance_Guide_1984.pdf HSC50 Maintenance Guide] (pg. 1). However, I see that the [http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/dsa/hsc/EK-HSC50-UG-002_HSC50_Users_Guide_Aug84.pdf HSC50 User Guide] calls it the "HSC50 Mass Storage Server" (Preface, pg. v). So, several DEC documents about the HSC50 disagree about the 'Controller'/'Server', but do agree on the 'Mass Storage'! | ||
+ | : To add to the confusion, 'Controller' would seem to be preferred from the name, "HS'''C'''" - but if we are to rely on ''that'' as a guide, then we should go with 'Hierarchical'!! | ||
+ | : Do you know of any DEC documents that give the formal name of the HSC50 to be 'HSC50 Hierarchical Storage Controller'? | ||
+ | : I personally do not care at all whether the page is named 'HSC50 Mass-Storage Controller' or 'HSC50 Hierarchical Storage Controller'; either would be fine with me. As usual, I care less what is ''logical'', than what is ''historically accurate'' - what DEC itself actually called the thing ''at the time''. | ||
+ | : And, as usual, contradictory evidence of what that was leaves us in the dark! [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 13:22, 23 August 2022 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: I found seven occurrances of "Hierarchical Storage Controller", and for the sake of the Acronym "HSC", I would like that. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::* EK-HSCMA-SV-001 HSC Service Manual, page 21 (2*) | ||
+ | ::* EK-HSCMA-SV-002 HSC Service Manual, page 21 | ||
+ | ::* EK-HSCMN-IN-001 HSC Installation Manual, page 9 | ||
+ | ::* EK-HSCMN-IN-002 HSC Installation Manual, pages 13, 17, 18 | ||
+ | ::* R. Lary and R. Bean, "The Hierarchical Storage Controller, A Tightly Coupled Multiprocessor as Storage Server," Digital Technical Journal, vol. 1, no. 8 (February 1989): 8-24. | ||
+ | ::* AA-GMEAA-TK HSC User Guide HSC50 V2.50 HSC70 V1.00-O, page 341: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::HSC - Hierarchical Storage Controller | ||
+ | ::An intelligent mass storage server used on the Computer Interconnect (CI) bus. | ||
+ | ::capable of supporting a total of eight and/or tape data channels, the HSC is part of the System Interconnect Architecture and DIGITAL Storage Architecture | ||
+ | ::By performing as an I/O manager, the HSC can be classified as an I/O server, removing the burden of I/O management from the CPU. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::* Software Product Description Compaq OpenVMS Operating7.2-1H1, and 7.2-2. System for Alpha and VAX, Versions 7.2, 7.2-1, SPD 41.87.08, pages 43, 44 [[User:Vaxorcist|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist|talk]]) 16:10, 23 August 2022 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : Oh, I don't doubt that 'HSC' (on its own) was normally expanded to 'Hierarchical Storage Controller' by DEC - but that is a subtly different question from 'what was DEC's formal name for the HSC50'. It is certainly illogical that they called the HSC50 anything ''other'' than 'Hierarchical Storage Controller' - but there are two HSC50 documents that do just that! (And the fact that those names are capitalized there argues that they are - or are intended to be - formal names, and not just descriptive phrases which are appended to "HSC50" to indicate what an HSC50 ''was''.) | ||
+ | : Of course, one could well conclude from that variability that DEC did not ''have'' a formal name for the HSC50 - other than "HSC50". Anyway, let me go look at those manuals you found. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 16:34, 23 August 2022 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::: I couldn't find EK-HSCMN-IN-001 or AA-GMEAA-TK online. If you have a paper copy of either one, you should scan it, and make it available. | ||
+ | ::: None of the others provided any insight into what DEC's formal name for the HSC50 was. | ||
+ | ::: So, taking into account the confusion inside the DEC manuals that ''do'' give a formal name for it (above), it might just as well be at [[HSC50 Hierarchical Storage Controller]]. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 17:01, 24 August 2022 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: I would judge that the article in the Digital Technical Journal is of special importance. Furthermore I would like to draw the attention to the difference between what "something is" and what "something is named". | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: By the way - I like the way we're debating such things as if they were really important! [[User:Vaxorcist|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist|talk]]) 16:42, 23 August 2022 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: Another thought: What does the "DEC Acronyms Book" say in this matter? [[User:Vaxorcist|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist|talk]]) 16:55, 23 August 2022 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::: You must have a strange definition of "important"! :-) I think I would rather, as the expression in English goes, 'drill a hole in my skull - with a ''dull'' drill'! | ||
+ | ::: I'm on travel this week, and do not have access to my copy of the DEC Acronyms Book. Not that it really matters, I think; I am sure that i) it won't give the formal name of the HSC50, or ii) the usual expansion of 'HSC' was 'Hierarchical Storage Controller'. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 17:01, 24 August 2022 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: Fourth name of HSC models is "Intelligent I/O Server" (according to "Systems and Options Catalog 1991 July-September"). | ||
+ | :: I doubt the controller itself is really "intelligent", but its creators. | ||
+ | :: More than ten years of success (HSC50:1983 - HSC65/HSC95:1993) are a good proof of an intelligent concept and realization for me. | ||
+ | :: Maybe DEC's formal name for the HSC models was just "HSC", and all other names marketing strategy decisions? [[User:Vaxorcist|Vaxorcist]] ([[User talk:Vaxorcist|talk]]) 11:29, 25 August 2022 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::: "Intelligent" is DEC's own descriptive term for HSC units, e.g. "defined as an intelligent mass storage subsystem server" (from the [http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/dsa/hsc/EK-HSC50-UG-002_HSC50_Users_Guide_Aug84.pdf HSC50 User Guide], pg. 1-1). | ||
+ | ::: I know you are a big fan of the VAX line, but I would describe them as merely 'competent'; they had nothing like the lasting impact of contemporaries like the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_801 IBM 801]. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 07:13, 26 August 2022 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 06:13, 26 August 2022
HSC50 Naming
DEC usually called all its HSCs "Hierarchical Storage Controller"; the term "Mass-Storage Controller" was only used to describe what HSCs do. DEC wanted to distinguish clearly between "ordinary" Mass-Storage Controllers (UDA50, KDA50, ...) and CI-based HSC controllers or other Cluster storage controllers (like HSDxx, HSGxx, HSJxx, ...) .
I would propose renaming the HSC50 page to "HSC50 Hierarchical Storage Controller". Vaxorcist (talk) 11:29, 23 August 2022 (CEST)
- I got the "HSC50 Mass-Storage Controller' from the HSC50 Maintenance Guide (pg. 1). However, I see that the HSC50 User Guide calls it the "HSC50 Mass Storage Server" (Preface, pg. v). So, several DEC documents about the HSC50 disagree about the 'Controller'/'Server', but do agree on the 'Mass Storage'!
- To add to the confusion, 'Controller' would seem to be preferred from the name, "HSC" - but if we are to rely on that as a guide, then we should go with 'Hierarchical'!!
- Do you know of any DEC documents that give the formal name of the HSC50 to be 'HSC50 Hierarchical Storage Controller'?
- I personally do not care at all whether the page is named 'HSC50 Mass-Storage Controller' or 'HSC50 Hierarchical Storage Controller'; either would be fine with me. As usual, I care less what is logical, than what is historically accurate - what DEC itself actually called the thing at the time.
- And, as usual, contradictory evidence of what that was leaves us in the dark! Jnc (talk) 13:22, 23 August 2022 (CEST)
- I found seven occurrances of "Hierarchical Storage Controller", and for the sake of the Acronym "HSC", I would like that.
- EK-HSCMA-SV-001 HSC Service Manual, page 21 (2*)
- EK-HSCMA-SV-002 HSC Service Manual, page 21
- EK-HSCMN-IN-001 HSC Installation Manual, page 9
- EK-HSCMN-IN-002 HSC Installation Manual, pages 13, 17, 18
- R. Lary and R. Bean, "The Hierarchical Storage Controller, A Tightly Coupled Multiprocessor as Storage Server," Digital Technical Journal, vol. 1, no. 8 (February 1989): 8-24.
- AA-GMEAA-TK HSC User Guide HSC50 V2.50 HSC70 V1.00-O, page 341:
- HSC - Hierarchical Storage Controller
- An intelligent mass storage server used on the Computer Interconnect (CI) bus.
- capable of supporting a total of eight and/or tape data channels, the HSC is part of the System Interconnect Architecture and DIGITAL Storage Architecture
- By performing as an I/O manager, the HSC can be classified as an I/O server, removing the burden of I/O management from the CPU.
- Oh, I don't doubt that 'HSC' (on its own) was normally expanded to 'Hierarchical Storage Controller' by DEC - but that is a subtly different question from 'what was DEC's formal name for the HSC50'. It is certainly illogical that they called the HSC50 anything other than 'Hierarchical Storage Controller' - but there are two HSC50 documents that do just that! (And the fact that those names are capitalized there argues that they are - or are intended to be - formal names, and not just descriptive phrases which are appended to "HSC50" to indicate what an HSC50 was.)
- Of course, one could well conclude from that variability that DEC did not have a formal name for the HSC50 - other than "HSC50". Anyway, let me go look at those manuals you found. Jnc (talk) 16:34, 23 August 2022 (CEST)
- I couldn't find EK-HSCMN-IN-001 or AA-GMEAA-TK online. If you have a paper copy of either one, you should scan it, and make it available.
- None of the others provided any insight into what DEC's formal name for the HSC50 was.
- So, taking into account the confusion inside the DEC manuals that do give a formal name for it (above), it might just as well be at HSC50 Hierarchical Storage Controller. Jnc (talk) 17:01, 24 August 2022 (CEST)
- I would judge that the article in the Digital Technical Journal is of special importance. Furthermore I would like to draw the attention to the difference between what "something is" and what "something is named".
- You must have a strange definition of "important"! :-) I think I would rather, as the expression in English goes, 'drill a hole in my skull - with a dull drill'!
- I'm on travel this week, and do not have access to my copy of the DEC Acronyms Book. Not that it really matters, I think; I am sure that i) it won't give the formal name of the HSC50, or ii) the usual expansion of 'HSC' was 'Hierarchical Storage Controller'. Jnc (talk) 17:01, 24 August 2022 (CEST)
- Fourth name of HSC models is "Intelligent I/O Server" (according to "Systems and Options Catalog 1991 July-September").
- I doubt the controller itself is really "intelligent", but its creators.
- More than ten years of success (HSC50:1983 - HSC65/HSC95:1993) are a good proof of an intelligent concept and realization for me.
- Maybe DEC's formal name for the HSC models was just "HSC", and all other names marketing strategy decisions? Vaxorcist (talk) 11:29, 25 August 2022 (CEST)
- "Intelligent" is DEC's own descriptive term for HSC units, e.g. "defined as an intelligent mass storage subsystem server" (from the HSC50 User Guide, pg. 1-1).
- I know you are a big fan of the VAX line, but I would describe them as merely 'competent'; they had nothing like the lasting impact of contemporaries like the IBM 801. Jnc (talk) 07:13, 26 August 2022 (CEST)