Difference between revisions of "Williams tube"
(Alt name) |
m (→External links: +From Cathode Ray Tube to Ferranti Mark I) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Williams tube''' (also called the '''Williams-Kilburn tube'''), invented by Frederic C. Williams and Tom Kilburn, was one of the technologies used for [[main memory]] in the very earliest computers, along with [[delay line]]s and [[drum]]s. It used [[electrostatic]] storage on the face of a [[cathode ray tube]] (CRT). Although it needed very subtle [[electronics]], the advantage over the other two was that it was [[random access]]; the time to gain access to any particular bit was constant. | The '''Williams tube''' (also called the '''Williams-Kilburn tube'''), invented by Frederic C. Williams and Tom Kilburn, was one of the technologies used for [[main memory]] in the very earliest computers, along with [[delay line]]s and [[drum]]s. It used [[electrostatic]] storage on the face of a [[cathode ray tube]] (CRT). Although it needed very subtle [[electronics]], the advantage over the other two was that it was [[random access]]; the time to gain access to any particular bit was constant. | ||
− | Among the early computers to use it were the [[Manchester Baby]] (and its descendants, the [[Manchester Mark I]] and [[Ferranti Mark | + | Among the early computers to use it were the [[Manchester Baby]] (and its descendants, the [[Manchester Mark I]] and [[Ferranti Mark 1]]), the [[IAS computer]] (and most of its many clones, too many to list here), the [[IBM 701]] and [[IBM 702|702]], and the [[ERA 1103]]. |
==Details== | ==Details== | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* [https://curation.cs.manchester.ac.uk/computer50/www.computer50.org/kgill/mark1/report1947cover.html Covering Notes for Tom Kilburn's 1947 report to TRE: ''A Storage System for Use with Binary Digital Computing Machines''] | * [https://curation.cs.manchester.ac.uk/computer50/www.computer50.org/kgill/mark1/report1947cover.html Covering Notes for Tom Kilburn's 1947 report to TRE: ''A Storage System for Use with Binary Digital Computing Machines''] | ||
* [https://www.computerhistory.org/revolution/memory-storage/8/308 Williams-Kilburn Tubes] | * [https://www.computerhistory.org/revolution/memory-storage/8/308 Williams-Kilburn Tubes] | ||
+ | * [http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/CCS/res/res02.htm#e From Cathode Ray Tube to Ferranti Mark I] - personal memories from Tom Kilburn | ||
[[Category: Memory Basics]] | [[Category: Memory Basics]] |
Latest revision as of 14:57, 14 March 2024
The Williams tube (also called the Williams-Kilburn tube), invented by Frederic C. Williams and Tom Kilburn, was one of the technologies used for main memory in the very earliest computers, along with delay lines and drums. It used electrostatic storage on the face of a cathode ray tube (CRT). Although it needed very subtle electronics, the advantage over the other two was that it was random access; the time to gain access to any particular bit was constant.
Among the early computers to use it were the Manchester Baby (and its descendants, the Manchester Mark I and Ferranti Mark 1), the IAS computer (and most of its many clones, too many to list here), the IBM 701 and 702, and the ERA 1103.
Details
The basic physical process used was 'secondary emission'; when the electron beam of the CRT hits the phosphor on the tube face, it emits extra electrons, leaving a spot which is depleted of electrons. This leaves a 'well', a spot of electric charge. If the beam is then directed to a nearby spot, secondary electrons from that will fill the well.
This effect can be used to store data; if the well is left intact, that spot can be taken to represent 0, and if the well is filled, that can be 1.
To read the data out, the beam is briefly directed toward the original spot; depending on whether it held a well, or nothing, a tiny electrical signal is produced which can be picked up on a conductor plate placed close to the tube face, and amplified.
The charge wells tended to disappear fairly quickly, so the data had to be refreshed at a fairly high rate.