Difference between revisions of "Talk:386BSD"
From Computer History Wiki
(New page: You can get 386BSD to run in a patched bochs 2.4.2, full blown with all the patches, triple make world, the works. Ok, ok, try to compile perl-5.10.1 and the compiler segfaults, but what i...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You can get 386BSD to run in a patched bochs 2.4.2, full blown with all the patches, triple make world, the works. Ok, ok, try to compile perl-5.10.1 and the compiler segfaults, but what is in the distro works. Everything works. There exists a broken (in a mere two pieces) shell script that reproduces a bochs image and environment on an AWS default fedora server. The script is of such questionable and perverted command line art that it is deemed unredistributable in its current form. It can be done! | You can get 386BSD to run in a patched bochs 2.4.2, full blown with all the patches, triple make world, the works. Ok, ok, try to compile perl-5.10.1 and the compiler segfaults, but what is in the distro works. Everything works. There exists a broken (in a mere two pieces) shell script that reproduces a bochs image and environment on an AWS default fedora server. The script is of such questionable and perverted command line art that it is deemed unredistributable in its current form. It can be done! | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Can you give more details? | ||
| + | Suddenly this is interesting again... ! | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Neozeed|neozeed]] 17:57, 3 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:57, 3 April 2010
You can get 386BSD to run in a patched bochs 2.4.2, full blown with all the patches, triple make world, the works. Ok, ok, try to compile perl-5.10.1 and the compiler segfaults, but what is in the distro works. Everything works. There exists a broken (in a mere two pieces) shell script that reproduces a bochs image and environment on an AWS default fedora server. The script is of such questionable and perverted command line art that it is deemed unredistributable in its current form. It can be done!
Can you give more details?
Suddenly this is interesting again... !
neozeed 17:57, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
