Talk:Installing 386BSD on BOCHS: Difference between revisions
From Computer History Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[User:Neozeed|neozeed]] 03:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Neozeed|neozeed]] 03:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
---- | |||
I tried the windows package you made. Works like a charm. Judging machdep.c you can tone down -m to 64 though. | I tried the windows package you made. Works like a charm. Judging machdep.c you can tone down -m to 64 though. | ||
[[User:Dugo|Dugo]] | [[User:Dugo|Dugo]] | ||
---- | |||
Yeah I kind of figured... It's like NT 3.1 back in the day, those boards could only go to 64MB, and we were RICH if we had 16..! I managed to build gcc 2.5.8 on 0.1 pl 24 (is that the right name for it?!), but where to go from here...? I guess [[X11]] is the next big hurdle.. Then I guess [[Quake]] or [[Doom]], but after that... I guess just a matter of keeping it around. | |||
[[User:Neozeed|neozeed]] 17:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:29, 21 April 2010
FYI once patchkit 1's kernel is built, it'll run on Qemu!!.. and a zillion times faster to rebuild world that way...!
0.11.0 works great.. 0.12.3 not so great.
neozeed 03:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
I tried the windows package you made. Works like a charm. Judging machdep.c you can tone down -m to 64 though.
Yeah I kind of figured... It's like NT 3.1 back in the day, those boards could only go to 64MB, and we were RICH if we had 16..! I managed to build gcc 2.5.8 on 0.1 pl 24 (is that the right name for it?!), but where to go from here...? I guess X11 is the next big hurdle.. Then I guess Quake or Doom, but after that... I guess just a matter of keeping it around.
neozeed 17:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
