Difference between revisions of "Talk:Power 6/32"
From Computer History Wiki
(→More info coming: Can we get in touch with Retrev?) |
(→More info coming: I'll send them email enquiring) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
: It would be interesting to hear what "Retrev" was able to find out. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff|talk]]) 09:09, 10 August 2023 (CEST) | : It would be interesting to hear what "Retrev" was able to find out. [[User:Larsbrinkhoff|Larsbrinkhoff]] ([[User talk:Larsbrinkhoff|talk]]) 09:09, 10 August 2023 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: Well, that was the only thing they [[Special:Contributions/Retrev|ever posted]] here. I'll send them email, using the [[Special:EmailUser/Retrev|send email]] link - assuming the email address they had back then still works. [[User:Jnc|Jnc]] ([[User talk:Jnc|talk]]) 00:46, 11 August 2023 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 00:47, 11 August 2023
Speed info
(The spammers constantly delete this page. I frankly cannot keep up.)
The Power 6/32 was the famous Tahoe machine of 4.3 BSD fame, made by Computer Consoles Inc
All that I can find out about them is this table from http://www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/dhrystone.c
*----------------DHRYSTONE VERSION 1.0 RESULTS BEGIN-------------------------- * * MACHINE MICROPROCESSOR OPERATING COMPILER DHRYSTONES/SEC. * TYPE SYSTEM NO REG REGS * -------------------------- ------------ ----------- --------------- * CCI POWER 6/32 COS(SV+4.2) cc 7500 7800 * CCI POWER 6/32 POWER 6 UNIX/V cc 8236 8498 * CCI POWER 6/32 4.2 Rel. 1.2b cc 8963 9544 * VAX 11/780 - UNIX 5.2 cc 1515 1562 * VAX 11/780 - UNIX 4.3bsd cc 1646 1662
Which may give some indication on the initial reasons why the Power 6/32 was chosen as the sucessor to the VAX by CSRG. Neozeed (talk) 17:01, 10 February 2009
More info coming
Working on obtaining some images and background information on Tahoe from one of the designers. Stay tuned. Retrev (talk) 18:02, 1 May 2018
- It would be interesting to hear what "Retrev" was able to find out. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 09:09, 10 August 2023 (CEST)
- Well, that was the only thing they ever posted here. I'll send them email, using the send email link - assuming the email address they had back then still works. Jnc (talk) 00:46, 11 August 2023 (CEST)
