Difference between revisions of "Windows 1.0"

From Computer History Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (See also: +Windows 1.0 Developer Release 5)
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Windows 1.0 was the first release of the Microsoft Windows enviroment for [[MS-DOS]].  It was not a commercial sucess, however it's design would influnce the Presentation Manger for OS/2.
+
[[Image:Windows 1.0 retail box.jpg|150px|right|thumb|Windows 1.0]]
  
{{stub}} {{nav Microsoft Windows}}
+
'''Windows 1.0''' was the first release of the [[Microsoft]] [[Windows]] environment for [[MS-DOS]].  It was not a commercial success, however its design would influence the Presentation Manager for [[OS/2]].
[[Category:Operating Enviroments]]
+
 
 +
Windows 1.0 did not have overlapping [[window]]s, and it did not support PS/2 [[mouse|mice]]. It only ran in [[real mode]]. Needless to say this was *NOT* a popular version. It really only is of historical interest.
 +
 
 +
Even in a primitive state like this, it did have all of the components such as, USER, GDI, KERNEL etc..
 +
 
 +
There is an excellent article on the development of Windows 1.0 [http://technologizer.com/2010/03/08/the-secret-origin-of-windows/ here].
 +
 
 +
== Windows 1.0 Betas Builds ==
 +
 
 +
*[[Windows 1.0 Development Release 5]] (possibly the same thing as 'Windows 1.0 Developer Release 5', below)
 +
*[[Windows 1.0 Alpha]]
 +
*[[Windows 1.0 Beta]]
 +
*[[Windows 1.0 Premiere Edition]]
 +
 
 +
{{semi-stub}}
 +
 
 +
==See also==
 +
 
 +
* [[Windows 1.0 Developer Release 5]]
 +
 
 +
{{nav Microsoft Windows}}
 +
 
 +
[[Category: Microsoft Operating Environments]]
 +
[[Category: Window Systems]]

Latest revision as of 19:38, 13 January 2024

Windows 1.0

Windows 1.0 was the first release of the Microsoft Windows environment for MS-DOS. It was not a commercial success, however its design would influence the Presentation Manager for OS/2.

Windows 1.0 did not have overlapping windows, and it did not support PS/2 mice. It only ran in real mode. Needless to say this was *NOT* a popular version. It really only is of historical interest.

Even in a primitive state like this, it did have all of the components such as, USER, GDI, KERNEL etc..

There is an excellent article on the development of Windows 1.0 here.

Windows 1.0 Betas Builds

See also