Difference between revisions of "Talk:Windows 2.0"

From Computer History Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "this sucks, and need to be re-written.")
 
(Techniacalities)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
this sucks, and need to be re-written.
 
this sucks, and need to be re-written.
 +
 +
== Concerns about technicalities ==
 +
It says that Win/396 can run under Win/386,
 +
but then that would mean that the 386 mode hypervisor,
 +
can run VM386 Apps and not just VM86 Apps on a 386,
 +
Whereas, my experience was that Win386 could run multiple
 +
VM86 tasks, the first, MS-DOS was the first 640K, and HiMem under 1Mb,
 +
but that all subsequent MS-DOS/VM86 tasks would run from the EMS window in upper memory,
 +
and I posted a assembly mode program to test if you were running,
 +
in real mode, ( the first DOS instance ), or V86 mode( all subsequent VM86s ).
 +
 +
We can test this all here:
 +
https://www.pcjs.org/software/pcx86/sys/windows/2.0x/
 +
and see which sessions will behave in which way.
 +
I will get this settled.
 +
 +
I agree that it will improve with some editing,
 +
but disagree that it sucks any worse than the software itself.
 +
 +
[[User:ForOldHack|ForOldHack]] ([[User talk:ForOldHack|talk]]) 11:02, 26 December 2021 (CET)

Latest revision as of 12:03, 26 December 2021

this sucks, and need to be re-written.

Concerns about technicalities

It says that Win/396 can run under Win/386, but then that would mean that the 386 mode hypervisor, can run VM386 Apps and not just VM86 Apps on a 386, Whereas, my experience was that Win386 could run multiple VM86 tasks, the first, MS-DOS was the first 640K, and HiMem under 1Mb, but that all subsequent MS-DOS/VM86 tasks would run from the EMS window in upper memory, and I posted a assembly mode program to test if you were running, in real mode, ( the first DOS instance ), or V86 mode( all subsequent VM86s ).

We can test this all here: https://www.pcjs.org/software/pcx86/sys/windows/2.0x/ and see which sessions will behave in which way. I will get this settled.

I agree that it will improve with some editing, but disagree that it sucks any worse than the software itself.

ForOldHack (talk) 11:02, 26 December 2021 (CET)